From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Colton Lewis" <coltonlewis@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 v2 3/6] arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 23:01:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708230129.13DCA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708225124.4130846-4-coltonlewis@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Writes to control-plane system registers are not immediately followed by an `isb()`.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH 6.6 v2 3/6] arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented ---
commit 2b993fe86ae9a0ae8ce53be35446a4e7f0a66876
Author: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented
Commit 3944382fa6f2 introduced checks for FEAT_E2H0 that were incorrect and
executed too late. This commit fixes the check for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0
and sets the HCR_EL2.E2H bit early to allow proper initialization for hVHE
mode as a nested guest.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240321115414.3169115-1-maz@kernel.org
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> index e32c8dd0b17a7..e0e710b36da37 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
[ ... ]
> @@ -588,22 +603,10 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(init_el2, SYM_L_LOCAL)
>
> mov_q x1, INIT_SCTLR_EL1_MMU_OFF
>
[ ... ]
> mrs x0, hcr_el2
> and x0, x0, #HCR_E2H
> cbz x0, 2f
> -1:
> +
> /* Set a sane SCTLR_EL1, the VHE way */
> pre_disable_mmu_workaround
> msr_s SYS_SCTLR_EL12, x1
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but shouldn't writes to
control-plane system registers be immediately followed by an isb()
instruction?
Looking at init_el2() in arch/arm64/kernel/head.S, as well as __init_el2_hcrx()
and __init_el2_timers() in arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h, there are
several locations where registers like SYS_SCTLR_EL12, SYS_HCRX_EL2, and
cnthctl_el2 are written without an immediate context synchronization event.
For example, right after the code shown in the diff above, SYS_SCTLR_EL12
is updated:
msr_s SYS_SCTLR_EL12, x1
mov x2, #BOOT_CPU_FLAG_E2H
b 3f
Could executing the subsequent branch or ALU instructions under an
architecturally undefined pipeline state cause unpredictable behavior or
unexpected traps during early boot?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708225124.4130846-1-coltonlewis@google.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 22:51 [PATCH 6.6 v2 0/6] arm64: KVM: Backport VHE-only boot fixes Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 1/6] arm64: sysreg: Add layout for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 23:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 10:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-09 20:30 ` Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 2/6] arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 22:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 3/6] arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 23:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 4/6] KVM: arm64: Initialize HCR_EL2.E2H early Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 23:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Initialize SCTLR_EL1 in __kvm_hyp_init_cpu() Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 6/6] arm64: Revamp HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 detection Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 22:59 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708230129.13DCA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox