Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Colton Lewis" <coltonlewis@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 v2 3/6] arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 23:01:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708230129.13DCA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708225124.4130846-4-coltonlewis@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Writes to control-plane system registers are not immediately followed by an `isb()`.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH 6.6 v2 3/6] arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented ---
commit 2b993fe86ae9a0ae8ce53be35446a4e7f0a66876
Author: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented

Commit 3944382fa6f2 introduced checks for FEAT_E2H0 that were incorrect and
executed too late. This commit fixes the check for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0
and sets the HCR_EL2.E2H bit early to allow proper initialization for hVHE
mode as a nested guest.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240321115414.3169115-1-maz@kernel.org

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> index e32c8dd0b17a7..e0e710b36da37 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
[ ... ]
> @@ -588,22 +603,10 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(init_el2, SYM_L_LOCAL)
>  
>  	mov_q	x1, INIT_SCTLR_EL1_MMU_OFF
>  
[ ... ]
>  	mrs	x0, hcr_el2
>  	and	x0, x0, #HCR_E2H
>  	cbz	x0, 2f
> -1:
> +
>  	/* Set a sane SCTLR_EL1, the VHE way */
>  	pre_disable_mmu_workaround
>  	msr_s	SYS_SCTLR_EL12, x1

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but shouldn't writes to
control-plane system registers be immediately followed by an isb()
instruction?

Looking at init_el2() in arch/arm64/kernel/head.S, as well as __init_el2_hcrx()
and __init_el2_timers() in arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h, there are
several locations where registers like SYS_SCTLR_EL12, SYS_HCRX_EL2, and
cnthctl_el2 are written without an immediate context synchronization event.

For example, right after the code shown in the diff above, SYS_SCTLR_EL12
is updated:

	msr_s	SYS_SCTLR_EL12, x1
	mov	x2, #BOOT_CPU_FLAG_E2H
	b	3f

Could executing the subsequent branch or ALU instructions under an
architecturally undefined pipeline state cause unpredictable behavior or
unexpected traps during early boot?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708225124.4130846-1-coltonlewis@google.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 22:51 [PATCH 6.6 v2 0/6] arm64: KVM: Backport VHE-only boot fixes Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 1/6] arm64: sysreg: Add layout for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 23:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 10:16   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-09 20:30     ` Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 2/6] arm64: Treat HCR_EL2.E2H as RES1 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.E2H0 is negative Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 22:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 3/6] arm64: Fix early handling of FEAT_E2H0 not being implemented Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 23:01   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 4/6] KVM: arm64: Initialize HCR_EL2.E2H early Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 23:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Initialize SCTLR_EL1 in __kvm_hyp_init_cpu() Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 22:51 ` [PATCH 6.6 v2 6/6] arm64: Revamp HCR_EL2.E2H RES1 detection Colton Lewis
2026-07-08 22:59   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260708230129.13DCA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox