Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Never clear KVM_REQ_VM_DEAD from a vCPU's requests
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 22:08:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806220856.D7A3B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806214618.82180-1-seanjc@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unhandled KVM_REQ_VM_DEAD across multiple architectures (s390, RISC-V, PowerPC, LoongArch) causes dead VMs to either improperly resume guest execution or get stuck in an infinite kernel loop.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] KVM: Never clear KVM_REQ_VM_DEAD from a vCPU's requests ---
commit c8b0ec7047292dc9b84167da2e2a4d9abf600813
Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

KVM: Never clear KVM_REQ_VM_DEAD from a vCPU's requests

This commit modifies KVM_REQ_VM_DEAD checks to use kvm_test_request()
instead of kvm_check_request(), ensuring the flag is never cleared. It
also adds a build-time assertion to guard against clearing it via standard
APIs.

> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 03bfc92864b6e..cf7fe835c4ad2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -2324,13 +2324,18 @@ static inline bool kvm_test_request(int req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return test_bit(req & KVM_REQUEST_MASK, (void *)&vcpu->requests);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void kvm_clear_request(int req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static __always_inline void kvm_clear_request(int req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(req == KVM_REQ_VM_DEAD);
> +
>  	clear_bit(req & KVM_REQUEST_MASK, (void *)&vcpu->requests);
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool kvm_check_request(int req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static __always_inline bool kvm_check_request(int req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> +	/* Once a VM is dead, it needs to stay dead. */
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(req == KVM_REQ_VM_DEAD);
> +

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while tightening the KVM_REQ_VM_DEAD API,
should this request be explicitly handled on other architectures?

Currently, s390, RISC-V, PowerPC, and LoongArch do not check for
KVM_REQ_VM_DEAD in their request handling loops. Because the flag is never
handled, kvm_request_pending() remains permanently true when a VM is marked
dead (e.g., via KVM_BUG_ON() in common pfncache or MMIO paths).

Could this cause the vCPU run loops to infinitely spin inside the kernel
without returning to userspace? For example:
- arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c:kvm_riscv_check_vcpu_requests()
- arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c:kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() calling
  kvmppc_core_check_requests()
- arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c:kvm_check_requests() inside kvm_pre_enter_guest()

Additionally, for s390:
- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c:kvm_s390_handle_requests() returns 0 when no
  other requests are handled. Can this cause the dead VM to improperly
  resume guest execution via sie64a() with a broken host state?

>  	if (kvm_test_request(req, vcpu)) {
>  		kvm_clear_request(req, vcpu);
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806214618.82180-1-seanjc@google.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 21:46 [PATCH] KVM: Never clear KVM_REQ_VM_DEAD from a vCPU's requests Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 22:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07  8:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-10  1:29 ` Huang, Kai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260806220856.D7A3B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox