From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Fix spurious warning for benign stage 2 teardown race
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 13:54:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812135429.DF04E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812-kvm-arm-nested-virt-fix-v1-1-4ad883f1b6a5@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Use-After-Free of the dynamically allocated `kvm->arch.nested_mmus` array when the MMU lock is dropped during stage-2 unmap operations.
- [High] NULL Pointer Dereference in `kvm_vcpu_init_nested()` during concurrent VM teardown.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Fix spurious warning for benign stage 2 teardown race ---
commit ffda2ec0115c7506d269acccba8c1f4511410e87
Author: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
KVM: arm64: Fix spurious warning for benign stage 2 teardown race
This patch suppresses a warning in stage2_apply_range() when the page table
pointer is found to be NULL after reacquiring the MMU lock. It assumes that
the NULL page table is a benign result of a concurrent teardown.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 74e7e7f7564c8..31e049ded0932 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -59,19 +59,25 @@ static phys_addr_t stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end)
> * long will also starve other vCPUs. We have to also make sure that the page
> * tables are not freed while we released the lock.
> */
> -static int stage2_apply_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t addr,
> +static int stage2_apply_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t start,
> phys_addr_t end,
> int (*fn)(struct kvm_pgtable *, u64, u64),
> bool resched)
> {
> struct kvm *kvm = kvm_s2_mmu_to_kvm(mmu);
> + phys_addr_t addr = start;
> int ret;
> u64 next;
>
> do {
> struct kvm_pgtable *pgt = mmu->pgt;
> + /*
> + * We may be raced on PGT teardown when we release the
> + * kvm->mmu_lock. That's fine as the PGT is legitimately no
> + * longer present.
> + */
> if (!pgt)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return resched && addr > start ? 0 : -EINVAL;
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does suppressing this warning mask a
regression where the mmu pointer itself is used after being freed?
When kvm_nested_s2_unmap() passes an mmu pointer to stage2_apply_range(),
that pointer references a dynamically allocated array:
arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c:kvm_nested_s2_unmap() {
...
struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
if (kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, ...);
}
If cond_resched_rwlock_write() drops the lock inside stage2_apply_range(),
a concurrent VM teardown or VCPU initialization can completely free this
array:
arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c:kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all() {
...
kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
kvm->arch.nested_mmus = NULL;
}
When the lock is reacquired, the loop continues and accesses mmu->pgt
from the now-freed memory. Is it possible that the warning was actually
firing because we were reading a freed mmu structure?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but looking at the concurrent VM teardown
path, does kvm_vcpu_init_nested() have a NULL pointer dereference?
When kvm_vcpu_init_nested() reallocates the array, it unconditionally
updates the mmu pointer for each entry:
arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c:kvm_vcpu_init_nested() {
...
for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++)
tmp[i].pgt->mmu = &tmp[i];
...
}
If kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all() concurrently calls kvm_free_stage2_pgd()
and sets pgt to NULL before the lock is acquired here, wouldn't this crash
when dereferencing tmp[i].pgt?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812-kvm-arm-nested-virt-fix-v1-0-4ad883f1b6a5@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 13:31 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix spurious warn, null ptr deref on S2 teardown race Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-12 13:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Fix spurious warning for benign stage 2 " Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-12 13:46 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-12 13:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-13 15:35 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-12 23:20 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-13 15:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-14 7:18 ` Yao Yuan
2026-08-14 8:48 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-12 13:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Fix null ptr deref in kvm_nested_s2_unmap() on S2 teardown Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-12 14:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 15:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812135429.DF04E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox