From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30A6D45D5D0; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 15:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786549767; cv=none; b=ckSa9dMjccTGexy4y1aNwQjKvwwxfqq397+blYMecQORCwOmbB2KSqcMa5ApIeNRzgkjrZZFih7aMAjRofRv3FC4XQ7QqNzu1yDH5E9+z7IyF/f3O18o8DzbgW68VwSjRerm0bkY6VPqCcx0rM2b6fKn6TQKOlyWVmHaL8xODbU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786549767; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8riGqDiAbY4BXyqe/VibcEJNipa/8ETK0gIIyQZF5kA=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=Aq06a3XuTObu2EtQt7rKwLHhiHXjmPe/X344Vxs3rJayM9pHI6lrE6QlprMVvBk9v9iO+p/J2NTJsGYi9ZKTUneMCl3q8YT98t+jpl9lQY8U9l0jzYqnoUY+CxLAAHSVfOghH8L/0QvMYpc8q019lNmFp5uonK/UOssPdXnLqUM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=BUZ+h6Hf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BUZ+h6Hf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 445A21F000E9; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 15:49:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786549765; bh=8riGqDiAbY4BXyqe/VibcEJNipa/8ETK0gIIyQZF5kA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=BUZ+h6HfS0RGM+fHht38C4unRRGoXtLa7Z/vtLEeccOF/sk/EaHQyWpmyN8KK/n9E qLva9a/Emt+/R+mcDMt9tiTIlhFSbZo88kBfH4x5JLw8Vm83bg9B6QiPanzQBgOD0z TbueR2vRB+MwhFommQygA4cu5BYhCYx5BLHojJUqmvCVth68RLhDVXilafE8vB4ldx roqmDoCDF70VQ1EUM9MZLGmD3oTFHqGQXU7tww3nRjoTt96iMcK8PSiFrTWhJGm0sP npLYTpyEdqwAoSnEevocn5jERlOd4vTzFTDdD4wsrV7L7nAJLB7JKCfWHN3rXWSZia xeJw6qjcxCfdA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/33] KVM: Allow KVM implementations to switch off MMIO independent of Kconfig Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Steffen Eiden" Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Oliver Upton" , "Christian Borntraeger" , "Vasily Gorbik" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Heiko Carstens" , "Marc Zyngier" In-Reply-To: <20260812153631.3376090-4-seiden@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260812153631.3376090-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com> <20260812153631.3376090-4-seiden@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 15:49:24 +0000 Message-Id: <20260812154925.445A21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Only defining KVM_MMIO is not flexible enough for multi-KVM systems > where one KVM implements MMIO but others do not. Solve this by > additionally testing for the non-existence of KVM_NO_MMIO before > including MMIO code to KVM. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812153631.3376= 090-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=3D3