From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B144639021C; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 16:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786550812; cv=none; b=nAePcy9Y+jo8eamH9MDT3AhMFwv44XfqTXZVZYCj06JfCaAZ4DE4CyCXKCD/cUAw5t5RFZa63IH29mN+J1O8J43uzClNDgT+Nxa3Syv7OHOiX2QitaVMjEfLYB6z1I7B9UpL8BvMB1pBacl8PAnjchOT0TzZQA1kQsj+Ixp7KrE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786550812; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8MeG+tX06+/XAooirhIyVJKDnibvbNvJbY1t3qs6K8g=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=YIyyZayTvI4e8X6pf3q+fbD3q1BI3zdRmuZ96y0YmnTbtLyMsECIuh57sX2xw1V68hlwmv4uZDrqYs4t8VjlLSvklklV1lsiuw5uyahq836dUJ83akz8mMp0BpAp3+lxQkjRi4lTJZBu2I8Xgu4BD0VGEYMdvrPkVliR7WHVlDA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PvPCFA92; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PvPCFA92" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 069F81F000E9; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 16:06:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786550811; bh=8MeG+tX06+/XAooirhIyVJKDnibvbNvJbY1t3qs6K8g=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=PvPCFA92crNnexqbX3WchfYjMH5fB9P8+vlCa0V3uFoiqcPBcV2EgXcojTqrBvkGk pP9yZy1HGstu+BXnVf20nlEXGy0EyagoLCaWiRKu1ifetJTYFLpNQl055J0xNw1a/S 4U0n+fm2Eicr7XMZ7Fdsk00We1BazLSFv5knu3SK5CT8L31JaNFR9O7H83LpoIz1jI AtL4uvnlLTUoS0ebpFAZ+EqmOLskGNLd0pBIaZqnrOwo4dQ+aJ3G0HveFMaITjrgDw 66aeYWrNh7rQ/+448wkycMGvBjOZf+RanZHuW+EjUFXKrBeqXZVecLDecXHpaIi/Lm MamIDSY1gWdfw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/33] KVM: s390: gmap: Make storage keys optional Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Steffen Eiden" Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Alexander Gordeev" , "Oliver Upton" , "Marc Zyngier" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" , "Heiko Carstens" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Christian Borntraeger" In-Reply-To: <20260812153631.3376090-20-seiden@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260812153631.3376090-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com> <20260812153631.3376090-20-seiden@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 16:06:50 +0000 Message-Id: <20260812160651.069F81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Guard guest storage key handling behind `KVM_S390_MANAGES_S390_GUEST`. > This enables other KVM implementations to use gmap without implementing > storage key infrastructure. Define KVM_S390_MANAGES_S390_GUEST to 1 for > KVM hosts managing s390 guests (in kvm_host_s390.h). A KVM > implementation not implementing those features must define > KVM_S390_MANAGES_S390_GUEST to 0 in its kvm_host_.h. >=20 > No functional changes besides the new guard. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812153631.3376= 090-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=3D19