From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Fuad Tabba" <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/17] KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI calls for protected VMs at EL2
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 07:16:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907071643.0B6FF1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907070002.3333525-9-fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The error path in `pkvm_reset_vcpu()` leaves `reset_state->reset = true`, breaking the synchronization barrier for subsequent `CPU_ON` calls.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Memory leak of SVE state pages when VM-wide initialization fails, due to clearing `KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE`.
--
commit c2e0971411fd802ad76348d4eef69923169c10e5
Author: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI calls for protected VMs at EL2
This commit implements PSCI 1.1 handling at EL2 for protected VMs. It manages
the vCPU power state transitions between OFF, ON_PENDING, and ON, and
intercepts PSCI calls like CPU_ON, CPU_OFF, and AFFINITY_INFO. Calls that
require host intervention, such as scheduling, are safely forwarded.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
> index 69f13362b7ab0..4ce79e191ff45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -407,6 +442,9 @@ static void unpin_host_sve_state(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu)
> return;
>
> sve_state = hyp_vcpu->vcpu.arch.sve_state;
> + if (!sve_state)
> + return;
> +
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the early return in
unpin_host_sve_state() cause a memory leak of SVE state pages when VM-wide
initialization fails?
If pkvm_vcpu_init_sve() fails on a secondary vCPU (for example, due to an
invalid configuration from host userspace), the error path in
pkvm_vcpu_init_sve() clears the KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE bit in the VM-wide
vcpu_features bitmap.
During the subsequent teardown of the VM, unpin_host_vcpus() calls
unpin_host_sve_state() for all vCPUs. Because the feature bit was cleared,
unpin_host_sve_state() returns early and fails to unpin the SVE state
memory that was successfully pinned for previously initialized vCPUs. This
allows for a denial of service via resource exhaustion from host userspace.
> hyp_unpin_shared_mem(sve_state,
> sve_state + vcpu_sve_state_size(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu));
> }
[ ... ]
> +int pkvm_reset_vcpu(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu)
> +{
> + struct vcpu_reset_state *reset_state = &hyp_vcpu->vcpu.arch.reset_state;
> + int prev;
> +
> + /*
> + * Pairs with smp_store_release(&reset_state->reset, true) in
> + * pvm_psci_vcpu_on(). The acquire must precede the cmpxchg: reversed, a
> + * winning cmpxchg with a false acquire would leave power_state == ON
> + * with the reset skipped.
> + */
> + if (!smp_load_acquire(&reset_state->reset))
> + return -ECANCELED;
> +
> + prev = cmpxchg_relaxed(&hyp_vcpu->power_state,
> + PSCI_0_2_AFFINITY_LEVEL_ON_PENDING,
> + PSCI_0_2_AFFINITY_LEVEL_ON);
> + if (prev != PSCI_0_2_AFFINITY_LEVEL_ON_PENDING) {
> + /* The only other writer of ON_PENDING is the rollback. */
> + WARN_ON(prev != PSCI_0_2_AFFINITY_LEVEL_OFF);
> + return -ECANCELED;
[Severity: High]
Does the -ECANCELED error path in pkvm_reset_vcpu() leave
reset_state->reset set to true, breaking the synchronization barrier for
subsequent CPU_ON calls?
If a CPU_ON hypercall is followed by a host rollback (which sets power_state
back to OFF but intentionally leaves reset_state.reset = true), a
subsequent CPU_ON from the guest sets power_state to ON_PENDING, writes
the new pc/r0, and sets reset_state->reset = true.
However, because reset_state->reset was already left as true, if the target
vCPU executes pkvm_reset_vcpu() concurrently, its
smp_load_acquire(&reset_state->reset) will immediately succeed. The target
vCPU then reads pc and r0 before the CPU_ON call has finished writing them,
resulting in a data race and the guest booting with corrupted state.
> + }
> +
> + kvm_reset_vcpu_core(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu);
> + kvm_reset_pvm_sys_regs(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu);
> +
> + /* Must be done after resetting sys registers. */
> + kvm_reset_vcpu_psci(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu, reset_state);
> +
> + hyp_vcpu->exit_code = 0;
> + /*
> + * power_state == ON rules out the other two writers, the source
> + * cmpxchg(OFF, ON_PENDING) and the rollback cmpxchg(ON_PENDING, OFF).
> + */
> + reset_state->reset = false;
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260907070002.3333525-1-fuad.tabba@linux.dev?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 6:59 [PATCH v2 00/16] KVM: arm64: Confine protected VM vCPU state to EL2 Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] KVM: arm64: Sync HCR_EL2.VSE back to the host vCPU under pKVM Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] KVM: arm64: Reject the PVTIME vCPU attribute for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce per-EC entry handlers for pKVM Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] KVM: arm64: Skip fixed-feature state flush for protected vCPUs Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 7:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 9:11 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] KVM: arm64: Add {flush,sync}_hyp_timer_state() primitives Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] KVM: arm64: Add system register reset framework for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 7:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 9:12 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-09 13:50 ` Joey Gouly
2026-09-10 10:05 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] KVM: arm64: Implement HVC handling for protected guests at EL2 Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI calls for protected VMs " Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 7:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07 9:14 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] KVM: arm64: Restrict KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT and PSCI version for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] KVM: arm64: Prevent host PC adjustments for protected vCPUs Fuad Tabba
2026-09-11 13:23 ` Joey Gouly
2026-09-11 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] KVM: arm64: Inject an UNDEF at EL2 for unhandled protected guest exits Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] KVM: arm64: Add per-EC entry/exit state marshalling for protected guests Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 7:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 9:15 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] KVM: arm64: Pend a protected guest's SError with HCR_EL2.VSE only Fuad Tabba
2026-09-11 10:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-11 10:58 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] KVM: arm64: Reject host access to protected VM private state Fuad Tabba
2026-09-11 12:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-07 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] KVM: arm64: Reject host power-on of a vCPU that EL2 holds powered off Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 7:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 9:17 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] KVM: arm64: Advertise the capabilities that protected VMs support Fuad Tabba
2026-09-07 7:00 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] KVM: arm64: Document the protected VM userspace API Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907071643.0B6FF1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox