From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: joey.gouly@arm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com, fuad.tabba@linux.dev,
qperret@google.com, weilin.chang@arm.com,
Keir Fraser <keirf@google.com>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/22] KVM: arm64: Prefault host stage-2 entries on block split
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:50:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911135053.146435-2-vdonnefort@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911135053.146435-1-vdonnefort@google.com>
From: Keir Fraser <keirf@google.com>
For the host stage-2 that is idmap, we can avoid lazy-mapping on block
splitting by propagating existing valid mappings to neighbouring entries
of the new table.
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keirf@google.com>
Co-developed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
index b74dd5ce1efd..34f78a58cded 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
@@ -1030,10 +1030,39 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_table_pre(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
return 0;
}
+static void stage2_map_prefault_idmap(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx, kvm_pte_t *ptep)
+{
+ kvm_pte_t block_pte = ctx->old;
+ u64 pa;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!kvm_pte_valid(block_pte))
+ return;
+
+ pa = ALIGN_DOWN(ctx->addr, kvm_granule_size(ctx->level));
+ for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; ++i, ++ptep, pa += kvm_granule_size(ctx->level + 1)) {
+ kvm_pte_t pte = kvm_init_valid_leaf_pte(pa, block_pte, ctx->level + 1);
+
+ /*
+ * Skip ptes in the range being modified by the caller if we're
+ * installing last level entries. Otherwise, we need to
+ * temporarily put in a valid mapping to make sure the
+ * prefaulting logic is triggered on the next
+ * stage2_map_walk_leaf(). This adds an unnecessary TLBI as
+ * we'll presumably re-break the freshly installed block, but
+ * that should happen very infrequently.
+ */
+ if ((ctx->level < (KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL - 1)) ||
+ (pa < ctx->addr) || (pa >= ctx->end))
+ *ptep = pte;
+ }
+}
+
static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
struct stage2_map_data *data)
{
struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops = ctx->mm_ops;
+ struct kvm_pgtable *pgt = data->mmu->pgt;
kvm_pte_t *childp, new;
int ret;
@@ -1051,6 +1080,9 @@ static int stage2_map_walk_leaf(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
if (!childp)
return -ENOMEM;
+ if (pgt->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_S2_IDMAP)
+ stage2_map_prefault_idmap(ctx, childp);
+
if (!stage2_try_break_pte(ctx, data->mmu)) {
mm_ops->put_page(childp);
return -EAGAIN;
--
2.55.0.1007.g17ff1f9808-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 13:50 [PATCH v2 00/22] Huge mapping support for protected VMs Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` Vincent Donnefort [this message]
2026-09-24 17:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] KVM: arm64: Prefault host stage-2 entries on block split Mostafa Saleh
2026-09-25 15:02 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] KVM: arm64: Propagate host stage-2 annotated " Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] KVM: arm64: Allow block-level stage-2 annotation Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] KVM: arm64: Use block-level annotations when setting up the host stage-2 Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] KVM: arm64: Make pKVM ownership selftest an HVC Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 14:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] KVM: arm64: Add a range to __pkvm_host_share/unshare_hyp() Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] KVM: arm64: Add a range to __pkvm_host_donate_guest() Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] KVM: arm64: Add a range to hyp_poison_page() Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] KVM: arm64: Add a range to __pkvm_host_reclaim_guest() Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] KVM: arm64: Add a range to __pkvm_guest_share_host() Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] KVM: arm64: Add a range to __pkvm_guest_unshare_host() Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] KVM: arm64: Handle huge mappings in __pkvm_host_force_reclaim_page_guest() Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] KVM: arm64: Handle huge mappings in __pkvm_vcpu_in_poison_fault() Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] KVM: arm64: Add a range to pKVM ownership selftest Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] KVM: arm64: Warn on pKVM guest stage-2 block collapse Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 16/22] KVM: arm64: Add pkvm_hyp_req infrastructure Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] KVM: arm64: Introduce kvm_pgtable_stage2_table_install() Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 18/22] KVM: arm64: Add __pkvm_host_split_guest HVC Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] KVM: arm64: Extend pKVM page ownership selftests to cover guest block split Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] KVM: arm64: Add PKVM_HYP_REQ_SPLIT Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] KVM: arm64: Raise PKVM_HYP_REQ_SPLIT on guest to host sharing Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] KVM: arm64: Stage-2 huge mappings for protected VMs Vincent Donnefort
2026-09-11 14:20 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911135053.146435-2-vdonnefort@google.com \
--to=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox