From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C87C7618F for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4D22173E for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:00:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AF4D22173E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35474A543; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 11:00:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UqIj1nGMUx4b; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 11:00:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B319A4A55B; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 11:00:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB6E4A530 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 11:00:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lqRiI4WRcXSr for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 11:00:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222B74A52A for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 11:00:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B405337; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 08:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.197.61] (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0A773F71A; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 08:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: Assign pmc->idx before kvm_pmu_stop_counter() To: Julien Thierry , Zenghui Yu , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <1563366019-31200-1-git-send-email-yuzenghui@huawei.com> <01fa98c1-8274-445c-5e04-219372920ba2@arm.com> From: Marc Zyngier Organization: Approximate Message-ID: <26b64d48-5ff9-7d62-bc44-601fdcc43223@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 16:00:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <01fa98c1-8274-445c-5e04-219372920ba2@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On 17/07/2019 14:44, Julien Thierry wrote: > Hi Zenghui, > > On 17/07/2019 13:20, Zenghui Yu wrote: >> We use "pmc->idx" and the "chained" bitmap to determine if the pmc is >> chained, in kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(). But idx might be uninitialized >> (and random) when we doing this decision, through a KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT >> ioctl -> kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(). And the test_bit() against this random >> idx will potentially hit a KASAN BUG [1]. >> >> Fix it by moving the assignment of idx before kvm_pmu_stop_counter(). >> >> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg36700.html >> >> Fixes: 80f393a23be6 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Support chained PMU counters") >> Suggested-by: Andrew Murray >> Cc: Marc Zyngier >> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu > --- >> virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c >> index 3dd8238..521bfdd 100644 >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c >> @@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu; >> >> for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) { >> - kvm_pmu_stop_counter(vcpu, &pmu->pmc[i]); >> pmu->pmc[i].idx = i; > > Yes, this is kind of a static property that should really be part of a > "kvm_pmu_vcpu_init()" or "kvm_pmu_vcpu_create()" and is not expected to > be modified across resets... > > There is no such function at the time and I'm unsure whether this > warrants creating that separate function (I would still suggest creating > it to make things clearer). Yup, that's pretty bad, now that you mention it. I'd be all for the introduction of kvm_pmu_vcpu_init(), given that we already have kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(). > >> + kvm_pmu_stop_counter(vcpu, &pmu->pmc[i]); > > Whatever other opinions are on splitting pmu_vcpu_init/reset, that > change makes sense and fixes the issue: > > Acked-by: Julien Thierry > >> } >> >> bitmap_zero(vcpu->arch.pmu.chained, ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS); >> > > Cheers, > Zenghui, could you please update your patch to take the above into account? Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm