From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4825CC47254 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 08:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF69F206B9 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 08:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TojqmxZ5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CF69F206B9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7642E4B1CA; Tue, 5 May 2020 04:40:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@kernel.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gk+spqmBe3Nn; Tue, 5 May 2020 04:40:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759BE4B1C6; Tue, 5 May 2020 04:40:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D444B1C6 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 04:40:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mZFB071q6BYe for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 04:40:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 804AF4B1C4 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 04:40:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 541FE2068E; Tue, 5 May 2020 08:40:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588668001; bh=+lAoCLRT0+FEtavrhvzvewEUxnz1O4jXBxyoaAJzyTU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TojqmxZ51MAKtNII0QJTZkHZV54vQs0dYCqdZzSyLZY69CtmzXEUlGOedXp492lYB Pb+hXuyVYXaBcWe++5qpKHqNYkLddxXfK29FC3Zy/SVXmLHj6vHNpjYSjFgPHssfM9 tJSpqFDEEFagx/s4/AinWjXsVVXozQpESISSAN6Q= Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org ([51.254.78.96] helo=www.loen.fr) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jVt7P-009L2s-N3; Tue, 05 May 2020 09:39:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 09:39:59 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: Tianjia Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] KVM: arm64: clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters In-Reply-To: <20200427043514.16144-3-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20200427043514.16144-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> <20200427043514.16144-3-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.3 Message-ID: <35eb095a344b4192b912385bc02c54e6@kernel.org> X-Sender: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 51.254.78.96 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, paulus@ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, peterx@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, chenhuacai@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: wanpengli@tencent.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, paulus@ozlabs.org, hpa@zytor.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, chenhuacai@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, jmattson@google.com, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, cohuck@redhat.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Hi Tianjia, On 2020-04-27 05:35, Tianjia Zhang wrote: > In the current kvm version, 'kvm_run' has been included in the > 'kvm_vcpu' > structure. For historical reasons, many kvm-related function parameters > retain the 'kvm_run' and 'kvm_vcpu' parameters at the same time. This > patch does a unified cleanup of these remaining redundant parameters. > > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang On the face of it, this looks OK, but I haven't tried to run the resulting kernel. I'm not opposed to taking this patch *if* there is an agreement across architectures to take the series (I value consistency over the janitorial exercise). Another thing is that this is going to conflict with the set of patches that move the KVM/arm code back where it belongs (arch/arm64/kvm), so I'd probably cherry-pick that one directly. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm