From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, drjones@redhat.com,
alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Cc: pshier@google.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, shuah@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] kvm: arm64: vgic: Introduce vgic_check_iorange
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:29:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ab60884-e006-723a-c026-b3e8c0ccb349@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210928184803.2496885-2-ricarkol@google.com>
Hi Ricardo,
On 9/28/21 8:47 PM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Add the new vgic_check_iorange helper that checks that an iorange is
> sane: the start address and size have valid alignments, the range is
> within the addressable PA range, start+size doesn't overflow, and the
> start wasn't already defined.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> index 7740995de982..f714aded67b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,28 @@ int vgic_check_ioaddr(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t *ioaddr,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int vgic_check_iorange(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t *ioaddr,
> + phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t alignment,
> + phys_addr_t size)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = vgic_check_ioaddr(kvm, ioaddr, addr, alignment);
nit: not related to this patch but I am just wondering why we are
passing phys_addr_t *ioaddr downto vgic_check_ioaddr and thus to
vgic_check_iorange()? This must be a leftover of some old code?
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, alignment))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (addr + size < addr)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (addr + size > kvm_phys_size(kvm))
> + return -E2BIG;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int vgic_check_type(struct kvm *kvm, int type_needed)
> {
> if (kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model != type_needed)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
> index 14a9218641f5..c4df4dcef31f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
> @@ -175,6 +175,10 @@ void vgic_irq_handle_resampling(struct vgic_irq *irq,
> int vgic_check_ioaddr(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t *ioaddr,
> phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t alignment);
>
> +int vgic_check_iorange(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t *ioaddr,
> + phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t alignment,
> + phys_addr_t size);
> +
> void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void vgic_v2_populate_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq, int lr);
> void vgic_v2_clear_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr);
Besides
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Eric
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-28 18:47 [PATCH v3 00/10] KVM: arm64: vgic: Missing checks for REDIST/CPU and ITS regions above the VM IPA size Ricardo Koller
2021-09-28 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] kvm: arm64: vgic: Introduce vgic_check_iorange Ricardo Koller
2021-09-29 16:29 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2021-09-29 21:17 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-30 7:02 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30 21:19 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-10-01 13:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-04 15:48 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-28 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Check redist region is not above the VM IPA size Ricardo Koller
2021-09-29 16:23 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-29 21:10 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-30 7:05 ` Eric Auger
2021-10-01 13:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-04 15:51 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-28 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] KVM: arm64: vgic-v2: Check cpu interface " Ricardo Koller
2021-09-29 16:30 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-28 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Check ITS " Ricardo Koller
2021-09-29 16:24 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-28 18:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: arm64: selftests: Make vgic_init gic version agnostic Ricardo Koller
2021-09-29 17:12 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-29 21:13 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-30 8:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-30 21:27 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-28 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] KVM: arm64: selftests: Make vgic_init/vm_gic_create " Ricardo Koller
2021-09-30 7:17 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-28 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add some tests for GICv2 in vgic_init Ricardo Koller
2021-09-30 7:42 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30 21:14 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-28 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add tests for GIC redist/cpuif partially above IPA range Ricardo Koller
2021-09-30 8:51 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30 20:49 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-28 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add test for legacy GICv3 REDIST base " Ricardo Koller
2021-09-30 9:00 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-29 0:10 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add basic ITS device tests Ricardo Koller
2021-09-30 9:14 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30 20:10 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-10-05 8:04 ` Eric Auger
2021-10-05 1:03 ` Ricardo Koller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ab60884-e006-723a-c026-b3e8c0ccb349@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox