From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: arm/arm64: Allow to use KVM without in-kernel
 irqchip
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:28:08 +0100
Message-ID: <55B5DD88.5070203@arm.com>
References: <cover.1436874248.git.p.fedin@samsung.com> <55A93488.9060408@arm.com> <00df01d0c22b$fcaef0d0$f60cd270$@samsung.com> <55ACAC73.9090500@arm.com> <03d901d0c44e$beadaa90$3c08ffb0$@samsung.com> <55B11AEC.4050804@arm.com> <008f01d0c625$45d91a90$d18b4fb0$@samsung.com> <55B26277.80205@arm.com> <007901d0c7a1$99981f50$ccc85df0$@samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <007901d0c7a1$99981f50$ccc85df0$@samsung.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>, "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: 'Christoffer Dall' <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>, 'Eric Auger' <eric.auger@linaro.org>
List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu

On 26/07/15 13:50, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>  Hello!
> 
>> As I said before, not having a VGIC pretty much puts you in an uncharted
>> territory, and the amount of hacks you have to introduce are not really
>> worth the effort in mainline.
> 
> And i agreed. So, i repeat the question. Will it be OK if we just
> enable KVM without both vGIC and vTimer, and that's all we do? It
> will be userland's problem how to handle them. I need to tweak my 
> first patchset a very small bit in order to do this.

I I'll repeat what I already said: "Show me the patches".

I'll only give you an answer once I exactly know what you're up to.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...