From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, christoffer.dall@linaro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
will.deacon@arm.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, wei@redhat.com,
cov@codeaurora.org, shannon.zhao@linaro.org,
peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, hangaohuai@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:42:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56670865.2050705@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449578860-15808-13-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
On 08/12/15 12:47, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> Since the reset value of PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR is UNKNOWN, use
> reset_unknown for its reset handler. Add a new case to emulate writing
> PMCNTENSET or PMCNTENCLR register.
>
> When writing to PMCNTENSET, call perf_event_enable to enable the perf
> event. When writing to PMCNTENCLR, call perf_event_disable to disable
> the perf event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 4 ++++
> virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 2304937..a780cb5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -577,6 +577,21 @@ static bool access_pmu_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
> break;
> }
> + case PMCNTENSET_EL0: {
> + val = p->regval;
> + if (r->Op2 == 1) {
> + /* accessing PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> + kvm_pmu_enable_counter(vcpu, val,
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) |= val;
> + } else {
> +
> + /* accessing PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
> + kvm_pmu_disable_counter(vcpu, val);
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~val;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> case PMCR_EL0: {
> /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -817,10 +832,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> access_pmu_regs, reset_pmcr, PMCR_EL0, },
> /* PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b001),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
> /* PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b010),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
> /* PMOVSCLR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b011),
> trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -1137,6 +1152,20 @@ static bool access_pmu_cp15_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
> break;
> }
> + case c9_PMCNTENSET: {
> + val = p->regval;
> + if (r->Op2 == 1) {
> + /* accessing c9_PMCNTENSET */
> + kvm_pmu_enable_counter(vcpu, val,
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMCR) & ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) |= val;
> + } else {
> + /* accessing c9_PMCNTENCLR */
> + kvm_pmu_disable_counter(vcpu, val);
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~val;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> case c9_PMCR: {
> /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -1220,8 +1249,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> /* PMU */
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMCR },
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi },
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMSELR },
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 36bde48..e731656 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU
> u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx);
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val);
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable);
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
> u32 select_idx);
> #else
> @@ -46,6 +48,8 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val) {}
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable) {}
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
> u32 select_idx) {}
> #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index 15babf1..45586d2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,53 @@ static void kvm_pmu_stop_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> }
>
> /**
> + * kvm_pmu_enable_counter - enable selected PMU counter
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMCNTENSET register
> + * @all_enable: the value of PMCR.E
> + *
> + * Call perf_event_enable to start counting the perf event
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +
> + if (!all_enable)
> + return;
You have the vcpu. Can you move the check for PMCR_EL0.E here instead of
having it in both of the callers?
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, (const unsigned long *)&val, ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS) {
Nonononono... If you must have to use a long, use a long. Don't cast it
to a different type (hint: big endian).
> + pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> + if (pmc->perf_event) {
> + perf_event_enable(pmc->perf_event);
> + if (pmc->perf_event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> + kvm_debug("fail to enable perf event\n");
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_disable_counter - disable selected PMU counter
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMCNTENCLR register
> + *
> + * Call perf_event_disable to stop counting the perf event
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +
Why are enable and disable asymmetric (handling of PMCR.E)?
> + for_each_set_bit(i, (const unsigned long *)&val, ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS) {
> + pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> + if (pmc->perf_event)
> + perf_event_disable(pmc->perf_event);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type - set selected counter to monitor some event
> * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> * @data: The data guest writes to PMXEVTYPER_EL0
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-08 12:47 [PATCH v6 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 01/21] ARM64: Move PMU register related defines to asm/pmu.h Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 02/21] KVM: ARM64: Define PMU data structure for each vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 13:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 13:53 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 14:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 14:14 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 03/21] KVM: ARM64: Add offset defines for PMU registers Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 04/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCR_EL0 register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 05/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSELR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 06/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCEID0 and PMCEID1 register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 14:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 07/21] KVM: ARM64: PMU: Add perf event map and introduce perf event creating function Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 15:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 7:38 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 08/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMEVTYPERn and PMCCFILTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 09/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMXEVTYPER register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 10/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMEVCNTRn and PMCCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 11:36 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 12:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 13:23 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 11/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMXEVCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 12/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-12-09 8:35 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 13/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMINTENSET and PMINTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 14/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMOVSSET and PMOVSCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 15/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMUSERENR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 9:18 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 16/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSWINC register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 17/21] KVM: ARM64: Add helper to handle PMCR register bits Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 18/21] KVM: ARM64: Add PMU overflow interrupt routing Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 19/21] KVM: ARM64: Reset PMU state when resetting vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 20/21] KVM: ARM64: Free perf event of PMU when destroying vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new kvm ARM PMU device Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:56 ` [PATCH v6 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56670865.2050705@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hangaohuai@huawei.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=peter.huangpeng@huawei.com \
--cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).