kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, christoffer.dall@linaro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	will.deacon@arm.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, wei@redhat.com,
	cov@codeaurora.org, shannon.zhao@linaro.org,
	peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, hangaohuai@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:42:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56670865.2050705@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449578860-15808-13-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>

On 08/12/15 12:47, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> 
> Since the reset value of PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR is UNKNOWN, use
> reset_unknown for its reset handler. Add a new case to emulate writing
> PMCNTENSET or PMCNTENCLR register.
> 
> When writing to PMCNTENSET, call perf_event_enable to enable the perf
> event. When writing to PMCNTENCLR, call perf_event_disable to disable
> the perf event.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h     |  4 ++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c        | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 2304937..a780cb5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -577,6 +577,21 @@ static bool access_pmu_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
>  			break;
>  		}
> +		case PMCNTENSET_EL0: {
> +			val = p->regval;
> +			if (r->Op2 == 1) {
> +				/* accessing PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> +				kvm_pmu_enable_counter(vcpu, val,
> +				   vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> +				vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) |= val;
> +			} else {
> +
> +				/* accessing PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
> +				kvm_pmu_disable_counter(vcpu, val);
> +				vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~val;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +		}
>  		case PMCR_EL0: {
>  			/* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
>  			val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -817,10 +832,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>  	  access_pmu_regs, reset_pmcr, PMCR_EL0, },
>  	/* PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
>  	{ Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b001),
> -	  trap_raz_wi },
> +	  access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
>  	/* PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
>  	{ Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b010),
> -	  trap_raz_wi },
> +	  access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
>  	/* PMOVSCLR_EL0 */
>  	{ Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b011),
>  	  trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -1137,6 +1152,20 @@ static bool access_pmu_cp15_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) = p->regval;
>  			break;
>  		}
> +		case c9_PMCNTENSET: {
> +			val = p->regval;
> +			if (r->Op2 == 1) {
> +				/* accessing c9_PMCNTENSET */
> +				kvm_pmu_enable_counter(vcpu, val,
> +				       vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMCR) & ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> +				vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) |= val;
> +			} else {
> +				/* accessing c9_PMCNTENCLR */
> +				kvm_pmu_disable_counter(vcpu, val);
> +				vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~val;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +		}
>  		case c9_PMCR: {
>  			/* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
>  			val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -1220,8 +1249,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
>  	/* PMU */
>  	{ Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
>  	  NULL, c9_PMCR },
> -	{ Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi },
> -	{ Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
> +	{ Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> +	  NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
> +	{ Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> +	  NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
>  	{ Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
>  	{ Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
>  	  NULL, c9_PMSELR },
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 36bde48..e731656 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU
>  u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx);
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val);
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable);
>  void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
>  				    u32 select_idx);
>  #else
> @@ -46,6 +48,8 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val) {}
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable) {}
>  void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
>  				    u32 select_idx) {}
>  #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index 15babf1..45586d2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,53 @@ static void kvm_pmu_stop_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * kvm_pmu_enable_counter - enable selected PMU counter
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMCNTENSET register
> + * @all_enable: the value of PMCR.E
> + *
> + * Call perf_event_enable to start counting the perf event
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> +	struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +
> +	if (!all_enable)
> +		return;

You have the vcpu. Can you move the check for PMCR_EL0.E here instead of
having it in both of the callers?

> +
> +	for_each_set_bit(i, (const unsigned long *)&val, ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS) {

Nonononono... If you must have to use a long, use a long. Don't cast it
to a different type (hint: big endian).

> +		pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> +		if (pmc->perf_event) {
> +			perf_event_enable(pmc->perf_event);
> +			if (pmc->perf_event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> +				kvm_debug("fail to enable perf event\n");
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_disable_counter - disable selected PMU counter
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMCNTENCLR register
> + *
> + * Call perf_event_disable to stop counting the perf event
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> +	struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +

Why are enable and disable asymmetric (handling of PMCR.E)?

> +	for_each_set_bit(i, (const unsigned long *)&val, ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS) {
> +		pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> +		if (pmc->perf_event)
> +			perf_event_disable(pmc->perf_event);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type - set selected counter to monitor some event
>   * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
>   * @data: The data guest writes to PMXEVTYPER_EL0
> 

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-08 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-08 12:47 [PATCH v6 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 01/21] ARM64: Move PMU register related defines to asm/pmu.h Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 02/21] KVM: ARM64: Define PMU data structure for each vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 13:37   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 13:53     ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 14:10       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 14:14         ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 03/21] KVM: ARM64: Add offset defines for PMU registers Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 04/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCR_EL0 register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 05/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSELR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 06/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCEID0 and PMCEID1 register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 14:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 07/21] KVM: ARM64: PMU: Add perf event map and introduce perf event creating function Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 15:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09  7:38     ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09  8:23       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 08/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMEVTYPERn and PMCCFILTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 09/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMXEVTYPER register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 10/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMEVCNTRn and PMCCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:30   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 11:36     ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 12:07       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 13:23         ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 11/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMXEVCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:33   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 12/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:42   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-12-09  8:35     ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09  8:56       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 13/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMINTENSET and PMINTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 14/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMOVSSET and PMOVSCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09  8:47     ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 15/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMUSERENR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09  9:18     ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09  9:49       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 16/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSWINC register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 17/21] KVM: ARM64: Add helper to handle PMCR register bits Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:36   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 18/21] KVM: ARM64: Add PMU overflow interrupt routing Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:37   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 19/21] KVM: ARM64: Reset PMU state when resetting vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 20/21] KVM: ARM64: Free perf event of PMU when destroying vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new kvm ARM PMU device Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:56 ` [PATCH v6 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56670865.2050705@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hangaohuai@huawei.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=peter.huangpeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
    --cc=wei@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).