Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: Allow vGICv4 configuration per VM
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 11:30:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d204cf7-c6a0-455c-8706-753e1fce3777@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250514192159.1751538-1-rananta@google.com>

Hi,

On 5/14/25 20:21, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> When kvm-arm.vgic_v4_enable=1, KVM adds support for direct interrupt
> injection by default to all the VMs in the system, aka GICv4. A
> shortcoming of the GIC architecture is that there's an absolute limit on
> the number of vPEs that can be tracked by the ITS. It is possible that
> an operator is running a mix of VMs on a system, only wanting to provide
> a specific class of VMs with hardware interrupt injection support.
> 
> To support this, introduce a GIC attribute, KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CONFIG_GICV4,
> for the userspace to enable or disable vGICv4 for a given VM.
> 
> The attribute allows the configuration only when vGICv4 is enabled in KVM,
> else it acts a read-only attribute returning
> KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CONFIG_GICV4_UNAVAILABLE as the value.
What's the reason for the cmdline enable continuing to be absolute in 
the disable case? I wonder if this is unnecessarily restrictive.

Couldn't KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CONFIG_GICV4_UNAVAILABLE be reserved for 
hardware that doesn't support vgic_v4 and if kvm-arm.vgic_v4_enable=0, 
or omitted, on supporting hardware then default to 
KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CONFIG_GICV4_DISABLE but allow it to be overridden? I 
don't think this changes the behaviour when your new attribute is not used.
> 
> On the other hand, if KVM has the vGICv4 enabled via the cmdline, the
> VM absorbs this configuration by default to maintain the backward
> compatibility. Userspace can get the attribute's value to check if the VM
> has vGICv4 support if it sees KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CONFIG_GICV4_ENABLE as the
> value. As required, it can disable vGICv4 by setting
> KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CONFIG_GICV4_DISABLE as the value.
> 
...
> 
> 

Thanks,

Ben


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-15 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-14 19:21 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: Allow vGICv4 configuration per VM Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-05-14 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] kvm: arm64: Add support for KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CONFIG_GICV4 attr Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-05-14 19:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] docs: kvm: devices/arm-vgic-v3: Document " Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-05-14 19:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Extend vgic_init to test GICv4 config attr Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-05-15 10:30 ` Ben Horgan [this message]
2025-05-15 10:48   ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: Allow vGICv4 configuration per VM Marc Zyngier
2025-05-15 15:55   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-05-15 16:48     ` Ben Horgan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5d204cf7-c6a0-455c-8706-753e1fce3777@arm.com \
    --to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox