From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, pshier@google.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
shuah@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: vgic: check redist region is not above the VM IPA size
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:42:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80bdbdb3-1bff-aa99-c49b-76d6bd960aa9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5eb41efd-2ff2-d25b-5801-f4a56457a09f@arm.com>
Hi Alexandru,
On 9/10/21 10:28 AM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On 9/9/21 5:47 PM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 11:20:15AM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
>>> Hi Ricardo,
>>>
>>> On 9/8/21 10:03 PM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
>>>> Extend vgic_v3_check_base() to verify that the redistributor regions
>>>> don't go above the VM-specified IPA size (phys_size). This can happen
>>>> when using the legacy KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST attribute with:
>>>>
>>>> base + size > phys_size AND base < phys_size
>>>>
>>>> vgic_v3_check_base() is used to check the redist regions bases when
>>>> setting them (with the vcpus added so far) and when attempting the first
>>>> vcpu-run.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 4 ++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
>>>> index 66004f61cd83..5afd9f6f68f6 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
>>>> @@ -512,6 +512,10 @@ bool vgic_v3_check_base(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>> if (rdreg->base + vgic_v3_rd_region_size(kvm, rdreg) <
>>>> rdreg->base)
>>>> return false;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (rdreg->base + vgic_v3_rd_region_size(kvm, rdreg) >
>>>> + kvm_phys_size(kvm))
>>>> + return false;
>>> Looks to me like this same check (and the overflow one before it) is done when
>>> adding a new Redistributor region in kvm_vgic_addr() -> vgic_v3_set_redist_base()
>>> -> vgic_v3_alloc_redist_region() -> vgic_check_ioaddr(). As far as I can tell,
>>> kvm_vgic_addr() handles both ways of setting the Redistributor address.
>>>
>>> Without this patch, did you manage to set a base address such that base + size >
>>> kvm_phys_size()?
>>>
>> Yes, with the KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST legacy API. The easiest way
>> to get to this situation is with the selftest in patch 2. I then tried
>> an extra experiment: map the first redistributor, run the first vcpu,
>> and access the redist from inside the guest. KVM didn't complain in any
>> of these steps.
> Yes, Eric pointed out that I was mistaken and there is no check being done for
> base + size > kvm_phys_size().
>
> What I was trying to say is that this check is better done when the user creates a
> Redistributor region, not when a VCPU is first run. We have everything we need to
> make the check when a region is created, why wait until the VCPU is run?
>
> For example, vgic_v3_insert_redist_region() is called each time the adds a new
> Redistributor region (via either of the two APIs), and already has a check for the
> upper limit overflowing (identical to the check in vgic_v3_check_base()). I would
> add the check against the maximum IPA size there.
you seem to refer to an old kernel as vgic_v3_insert_redist_region was
renamed into vgic_v3_alloc_redist_region in
e5a35635464b kvm: arm64: vgic-v3: Introduce vgic_v3_free_redist_region()
I think in case you use the old rdist API you do not know yet the size
of the redist region at this point (count=0), hence Ricardo's choice to
do the check latter.
>
> Also, because vgic_v3_insert_redist_region() already checks for overflow, I
> believe the overflow check in vgic_v3_check_base() is redundant.
>
> As far as I can tell, vgic_v3_check_base() is there to make sure that the
> Distributor doesn't overlap with any of the Redistributors, and because the
> Redistributors and the Distributor can be created in any order, we defer the check
> until the first VCPU is run. I might be wrong about this, someone please correct
> me if I'm wrong.
>
> Also, did you verify that KVM is also doing this check for GICv2? KVM does
> something similar and calls vgic_v2_check_base() when mapping the GIC resources,
> and I don't see a check for the maximum IPA size in that function either.
I think vgic_check_ioaddr() called in kvm_vgic_addr() does the job (it
checks the base @)
Thanks
Eric
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
>> Thanks,
>> Ricardo
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> if (IS_VGIC_ADDR_UNDEF(d->vgic_dist_base))
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-08 21:03 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Missing check for redist region above the VM IPA size Ricardo Koller
2021-09-08 21:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: vgic: check redist region is not " Ricardo Koller
2021-09-08 21:32 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-08 21:50 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-08 22:00 ` Oliver Upton
2021-09-09 10:20 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-09 14:43 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-09 16:47 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-10 8:28 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-10 8:42 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2021-09-10 19:32 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-13 8:51 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-13 10:15 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-14 3:20 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-14 11:00 ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-09-20 21:01 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-08 21:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: test for vgic redist " Ricardo Koller
2021-09-09 13:54 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-09 18:22 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-10 7:12 ` Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80bdbdb3-1bff-aa99-c49b-76d6bd960aa9@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox