From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B548C2BB85 for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E922137B for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UiRa/RX4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E4E922137B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6D34B221; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@kernel.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kqnYPeyPX5D9; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BF94B1D0; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972E34B18C for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qedhmV1AejLL for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A92C4B16D for ; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:24:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64B6B20857; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 09:23:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586597039; bh=K90rgXY4TWpAkIW5KZCWi0jhW+x/kY4ZiXFZIllEs2M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UiRa/RX4NHEViHO5ccU94Pb69h0ReC90LoUClRg83c7t3C5hRykS+47XYO75Io4iL QowIYv6pUSwZ5qUkJdmhOPyV1IDkAsBcy5+insjLhJ28goWRSy0QiJvnhrG/UROtyv vKHPVASCOiu14AB3sTGI3i0R3Kc7Zvyi/OZT4fZg= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=big-swifty.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNCMn-002LiR-Nk; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:23:57 +0100 Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:23:56 +0100 Message-ID: <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: "Zengtao (B)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <06d08f904f003160a48eac3c5ab3c7ff@kernel.org> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/26 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: prime.zeng@hisilicon.com, gcherian@marvell.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, jintack@cs.columbia.edu, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, areddy3@marvell.com, gkulkarni@marvell.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "andre.przywara@arm.com" , George Cherian , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Anil Kumar Reddy H , "Dave.Martin@arm.com" X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Hi Zengtao, On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100, "Zengtao (B)" wrote: > > Hi Marc: > > Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform > which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series > affects the existed virtualization functions or not. > > Any suggestion about the test focus? Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm