From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: Skip updating page table entry if no change
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 19:51:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871sb62gyi.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86mutup9mu.wl-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (Marc Zyngier's message of "Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:40:57 +0100")
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> writes:
> Hi Punit,
>
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:13:00 +0100,
> Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Contention on updating a page table entry by a large number of vcpus
>> can lead to duplicate work when handling stage 2 page faults. As the
>> page table update follows the break-before-make requirement of the
>> architecture, it can lead to repeated refaults due to clearing the
>> entry and flushing the tlbs.
>>
>> This problem is more likely when -
>>
>> * there are large number of vcpus
>> * the mapping is large block mapping
>>
>> such as when using PMD hugepages (512MB) with 64k pages.
>>
>> Fix this by skipping the page table update if there is no change in
>> the entry being updated.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
>> Cc: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>
> This definitely deserves a Cc to stable, and a Fixes: tag.
Agreed.
For PMD the issue exists since commit ad361f093c1e ("KVM: ARM: Support
hugetlbfs backed huge pages") when the file lived in arch/arm/kvm. (v3.12+)
For PTE the issue exists since commit d5d8184d35c9 ("KVM: ARM: Memory
virtualization setup"). (v3.8+)
I'll split the fix into two patches and add a cc to stable.
>> --
>> Hi,
>>
>> This problem was reported by a user when testing PUD hugepages. During
>> VM restore when all threads are running cpu intensive workload, the
>> refauting was causing the VM to not make any forward progress.
>>
>> This patch fixes the problem for PMD and PTE page fault handling.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Punit
>>
>> Change-Id: I04c9aa8b9fbada47deb1a171c9959f400a0d2a21
Just noticed this. Looks like the commit hook has escaped it's worktree.
>> ---
>> virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> index 1d90d79706bd..a66a5441ca2f 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> @@ -1027,6 +1027,18 @@ static int stage2_set_pmd_huge(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache
>> VM_BUG_ON(pmd_present(*pmd) && pmd_pfn(*pmd) != pmd_pfn(*new_pmd));
>>
>> old_pmd = *pmd;
>> + /*
>> + * Multiple vcpus faulting on the same PMD entry, can lead to
>> + * them sequentially updating the PMD with the same
>> + * value. Following the break-before-make (pmd_clear()
>> + * followed by tlb_flush()) process can hinder forward
>> + * progress due to refaults generated on missing translations.
>> + *
>> + * Skip updating the page table if the entry is unchanged.
>> + */
>> + if (pmd_val(old_pmd) == pmd_val(*new_pmd))
>> + return 0;
>
> Shouldn't you take this opportunity to also refactor it with the above
> VM_BUG_ON and the below pmd_present? At the moment, we end-up testing
> pmd_present twice, and your patch is awfully similar to the VM_BUG_ON
> one.
I went for the minimal change keeping a backport in mind.
The VM_BUG_ON() is enabled only when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is selected and
checks for pfn ignoring the attributes, while this fix checks for the
entire entry. Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't see an obvious
way to combine the checks.
I've eliminated the duplicate pmd_present() check and will post the
updated patches.
Thanks,
Punit
>> +
>> if (pmd_present(old_pmd)) {
>> pmd_clear(pmd);
>> kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(kvm, addr);
>> @@ -1101,6 +1113,10 @@ static int stage2_set_pte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
>>
>> /* Create 2nd stage page table mapping - Level 3 */
>> old_pte = *pte;
>> + /* Skip page table update if there is no change */
>> + if (pte_val(old_pte) == pte_val(*new_pte))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> if (pte_present(old_pte)) {
>> kvm_set_pte(pte, __pte(0));
>> kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(kvm, addr);
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-10 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-10 11:13 [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: Skip updating page table entry if no change Punit Agrawal
2018-08-10 11:27 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-08-10 14:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-10 18:51 ` Punit Agrawal [this message]
2018-08-13 14:27 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871sb62gyi.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox