From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com (mail-wm1-f54.google.com [209.85.128.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DB7F18E776 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 15:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.54 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723130303; cv=none; b=jbsoagzq+AmbUOjmTuAUz17AprIQsd18yQHnUHTzfInB8HbqfyGpN5JzxBuwoMcc8usHYdWzK3tZjbruUziBhobJ2M76axhESj+0qOlSp+hqeMhmeQ1XfU2PvJ73Leyvo0DltIH9kXKp5TKncRT04jX54LWMZirO94w5H36bfLA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723130303; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JIv1oe8oudJUiS44KwPc6LaXFpIpf2hHYtHrt3Gk7Fs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=anx+7ihgU4dlJBnS3GKKQUiH/keCmCS2LAImU7MfWqVfbbL10DFyN8kQ60qXxD+AENezXTjswmHmGWUpqMT6KZduB6IkhHXXNU7f7ytg59M+zlade4uK8JDZK2x2oTX/7rnENDGVWsJu/vlglA3b9wAf6ySLxW3lsXYwi5J3960= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=IpylZV/j; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.54 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="IpylZV/j" Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4280bca3960so8156245e9.3 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2024 08:18:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1723130300; x=1723735100; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=tobJ9z30Evl1jF8OZuU4Lc5uAJoWjkGhLZnI88VCnqo=; b=IpylZV/jbeFloUMJ8p4AzhqGfwrUM9Nc8387VAWtk1Mg1CadXPWcIPQqCXE+yUJ2hv 9TLS0IQb0wY9tiDkLUfN4uvlmaFWvzNB9FlvpBhKQ4YKw25SUaNVPjaAqL394UM/3oyX CpAlMqX0tKjZkn1upshNAt/O8blshQR79ejhv6VhwyLvDdAyGZttgHrADelA/9haBqkg 7N1dKxnYeRogEIU2aji7dbZ7yo0BXUGme9jXPG2Eq6lJDXFG5fULn+Ha5F9NpM+r9pHH XdkwRLiLfCf6fk2kOsVPwPOkYAKMYVv8ENPibE0FRJhCCyly/wJNUy9CK3+m90oYmfGO LZqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723130300; x=1723735100; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tobJ9z30Evl1jF8OZuU4Lc5uAJoWjkGhLZnI88VCnqo=; b=izKfPlA6PAon6DJmhc4H3k8Pq23ICKAKeUVYXgUpjWE2dcg3M4Krle+SGWCgasaVCB iqeYL5DI54fGm036WfJ5jYBasV60KdCbl9W9KeFwUTIswcFjadMwis4SMH1gp8lRf0Aa EJTCFBAfCoJqpRe7JPxPduEPrze/o+8Okfr3gQ9LU7I6PifIVIgWTD8EdzlwleqU8n0p 9lshdsFJm8599ZaO90DPZ6zMQHoVzViOpdWpFQUM1s7c4bFQtVoaQnPNhebK4QKTduMT ruQvz80+Q9p6abURKPEvYjCdcx20DHP+McglgMFOPVn4LVyBWQLp24rFFSfjlbCzJQSd Ei2g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV8OPMDAJlHE/4PWPtTdI0JPO+45na9U8QhFySTdKNrReU86qBrtAKXo07/1mxeowVGmidi90U=@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzT5Q9BO0qp1V9PBBC62v55N/TY3Y4G5B+8Z+DlEHs6Cbia1kvC CMZvtEZiXnGEZWHo8QuH0SzFI14YmN+IXCWjEQ6UaZaRHEI2KSNQ5Glrh+ucX5k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGvryFhFZyruwyY4esgEivQLYITNxgcfgoPAmbjFk+Vzw8kMU8OO4VMz6KIvqZ2Rys90VZ6yQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1914:b0:426:4f47:6037 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4290af13367mr16171145e9.19.1723130299428; Thu, 08 Aug 2024 08:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from draig.lan ([85.9.250.243]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-429059a5dbbsm78703665e9.36.2024.08.08.08.18.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Aug 2024 08:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from draig (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by draig.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0C45F769; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:18:17 +0100 (BST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Tianrui Zhao , Bibo Mao , Huacai Chen , Michael Ellerman , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , David Stevens Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 13/84] KVM: Annotate that all paths in hva_to_pfn() might sleep In-Reply-To: (Sean Christopherson's message of "Thu, 8 Aug 2024 06:16:46 -0700") References: <20240726235234.228822-1-seanjc@google.com> <20240726235234.228822-14-seanjc@google.com> <87bk23ql6n.fsf@draig.linaro.org> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 16:18:17 +0100 Message-ID: <877ccrqc06.fsf@draig.linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sean Christopherson writes: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: >> Sean Christopherson writes: >>=20 >> > Now that hva_to_pfn() no longer supports being called in atomic contex= t, >> > move the might_sleep() annotation from hva_to_pfn_slow() to >> > hva_to_pfn(). >>=20 >> The commentary for hva_to_pfn_fast disagrees. >>=20 >> /* >> * The fast path to get the writable pfn which will be stored in @pfn, >> * true indicates success, otherwise false is returned. It's also the >> * only part that runs if we can in atomic context. >> */ >> static bool hva_to_pfn_fast(struct kvm_follow_pfn *kfp, kvm_pfn_t *pfn) >>=20 >> At which point did it loose the ability to run in the atomic context? I >> couldn't work it out from the commits. > > It didn't lose the ability per se (calling hva_to_pfn_fast() in atomic co= ntext > would still be functionally ok), rather the previous patch > > KVM: Drop @atomic param from gfn=3D>pfn and hva=3D>pfn APIs > > removed support for doing so in order to simplify hva_to_pfn() as a whole. It still sticks out given the only caller no longer enforces this.=20 How about: * true indicates success, otherwise false is returned. It's also the * only part that could run in an atomic context if we wanted to * (although no callers expect it to). ? --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro