From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: cdall@linaro.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, wu.wubin@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] kvm: arm/arm64: vgic-v3: add ICH_AP[01]Rn accessors for GICv3
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:25:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877eywbvwb.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500287012-16996-4-git-send-email-wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com> (wanghaibin's message of "Mon, 17 Jul 2017 18:23:31 +0800")
On Mon, Jul 17 2017 at 6:23:31 pm BST, wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
> This patch is used for GICv2 on GICv3.
>
> About GICV_APRn hardware register access,the SPEC says:
> When System register access is enabled for EL2, these registers access
> ICH_AP1Rn_EL2, and all active priorities for virtual machines are held
> in ICH_AP1Rn_EL2 regardless of interrupt group.
>
> For GICv3 hardware, we access the active priorities from ICH_AP1Rn_EL2
> in this scene.
>
> Signed-off-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
> index f6f3681..3b648a7 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
> @@ -456,14 +456,26 @@ static int match_region(const void *key, const void *elt)
>
> void vgic_set_apr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 idx, u32 val)
> {
> + u32 vgic_model = vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model;
> +
> if (kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V2)
> vgic_v2_set_apr(vcpu, idx, val);
> + else {
Coding style.
> + if (vgic_model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2)
> + vgic_v3_set_apr(vcpu, 1, idx, val);
> + }
> }
>
> u32 vgic_get_apr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 idx)
> {
> + u32 vgic_model = vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model;
> +
> if (kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V2)
> return vgic_v2_get_apr(vcpu, idx);
> + else {
Same here.
> + if (vgic_model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2)
> + return vgic_v3_get_apr(vcpu, 1, idx);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> index 030248e..da40681 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -156,6 +156,26 @@ void vgic_v3_clear_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr)
> vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.vgic_lr[lr] = 0;
> }
>
> +void vgic_v3_set_apr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 group, u32 idx, u32 val)
> +{
> + struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> +
> + if (group)
> + cpu_if->vgic_ap1r[idx] = val;
> + else
> + cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[idx] = val;
> +}
> +
> +u32 vgic_v3_get_apr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 group, u32 idx)
> +{
> + struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> +
> + if (group)
> + return cpu_if->vgic_ap1r[idx];
> + else
> + return cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[idx];
> +}
> +
How do we ensure that these APRs are even valid? We can have anything
from 5 to 7 bits of preemption, and thus 1 to 4 APRs. The rest is
UNDEFined.
> void vgic_v3_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcrp)
> {
> struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> index 441ded7..19b0f8b 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> @@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ static inline void vgic_get_irq_kref(struct vgic_irq *irq)
> void vgic_v3_populate_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq, int lr);
> void vgic_v3_clear_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr);
> void vgic_v3_set_underflow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void vgic_v3_set_apr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 group, u32 idx, u32 val);
> +u32 vgic_v3_get_apr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 group, u32 idx);
> void vgic_v3_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
> void vgic_v3_get_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
> void vgic_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-17 10:23 [PATCH v2 0/4] kvm: arm/arm64: vgic: APRn uaccess support wanghaibin
2017-07-17 10:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] kvm: arm/arm64: vgic: Implement the vGICv2 GICC_APRn uaccess interface wanghaibin
2017-07-17 10:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] kvm: arm/arm64: vgic-v2: Add GICH_APRn accessors for GICv2 wanghaibin
2017-07-17 10:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] kvm: arm/arm64: vgic-v3: add ICH_AP[01]Rn accessors for GICv3 wanghaibin
2017-07-25 11:25 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2017-08-08 13:01 ` wanghaibin
2017-08-08 13:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-17 10:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] kvm: arm/arm64: vgic: clean up vGICv3 ICC_APRn sysreg uaccess wanghaibin
2017-07-21 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] kvm: arm/arm64: vgic: APRn uaccess support Christoffer Dall
2017-08-08 13:06 ` wanghaibin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877eywbvwb.fsf@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wu.wubin@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox