From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876E9C47094 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 16:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24ED61447 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 16:19:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F24ED61447 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5F24A51D; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 12:19:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ecVZjSpO7cEH; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 12:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0262849E93; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 12:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9F549E93 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 12:19:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kA61f0UE4VKv for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 12:19:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 778F54086D for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 12:19:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C5BD6141E; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 16:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1lqHxw-005zGP-BV; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 17:19:04 +0100 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 17:19:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87mts1zlzc.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Sean Christopherson Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Rename vm_handle_exception in evmcs test In-Reply-To: References: <20210604181833.1769900-1-ricarkol@google.com> <6d1f569a5260612eb0704e31655d168d@kernel.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: seanjc@google.com, ricarkol@google.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, drjones@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, oliver.sang@intel.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot , pbonzini@redhat.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 17:07:40 +0100, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 06, 2021, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > This is becoming a bit messy. I'd rather drop the whole series from > > -next, and get something that doesn't break in the middle. Please > > resend the series tested on top of -rc4. > > That'd be my preference too. I almost asked if it could be (temporarily) > dropped, but I assumed the hashes in -next are intended to be stable. I usually try and keep these commits stable. But in this case, we end-up with a broken build at some point in the series. For such cases, I'm more than happy to drop the series and merge a clean version again (I keep each series on a separate branch for this exact purpose). Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm