Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Fix yet another lock ordering turd
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 09:29:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o6rpz4i0.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904062348.223976-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>

On Thu, 04 Sep 2025 07:23:43 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
> syzkaller found yet another locking bug in the VGIC [*], this time due
> to nesting a 'plain' spinlock (xa_lock) inside of a raw spinlock
> (ap_list_lock). Given the way we do refcounts on LPIs it is possible
> for this exact sort of issue to crop up where the last reference may
> be dropped in unexpected places.
> 
> Small series to fix the issue by deferring xarray modifications outside
> of the ap_list_lock critical section along with some slight lockdep
> hinting to make these rare bugs a bit more obvious.

I quite like that we get a release operation, rather than the slightly
counter-intuitive construct we have today.

With the couple of issues that Ben and I raised fixed:

Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

	M.

-- 
Jazz isn't dead. It just smells funny.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-05  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-04  6:23 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Fix yet another lock ordering turd Oliver Upton
2025-09-04  6:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Use bare refcount for VGIC LPIs Oliver Upton
2025-09-04  6:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm64: Spin off release helper from vgic_put_irq() Oliver Upton
2025-09-04  6:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Erase LPIs from xarray outside of raw spinlocks Oliver Upton
2025-09-05  7:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-09-05  7:19     ` Oliver Upton
2025-09-04  6:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Don't require IRQs be disabled for LPI xarray lock Oliver Upton
2025-09-05  8:13   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-09-05  8:55     ` Oliver Upton
2025-09-04  6:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Indicate vgic_put_irq() may take " Oliver Upton
2025-09-04 10:25   ` Ben Horgan
2025-09-04  8:19     ` Oliver Upton
2025-09-05  8:29 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o6rpz4i0.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox