Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, andre.przywara@arm.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 11/11] arm/arm64: gic: don't just use zero
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:28:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90b580c8-e797-9da7-ebe7-e76719427535@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479157719-31021-12-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com>

Hi,

On 14/11/2016 22:08, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Allow user to select who sends ipis and with which irq,
> rather than just always sending irq=0 from cpu0.
>From a user point of view is there a way to know the list of available
tests and their arg?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> v6:
>  - make sender/irq names more future-proof [drew]
>  - sanity check inputs [drew]
>  - introduce check_sender/irq and bad_sender/irq to more
>    cleanly do checks [drew]
>  - default sender and irq to 1, instead of still zero [drew]
> v4: improve structure and make sure spurious checking is
>     done even when the sender isn't cpu0
> v2: actually check that the irq received was the irq sent,
>     and (for gicv2) that the sender is the expected one.
> ---
>  arm/gic.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
> index d954a3775c26..638b8b140c96 100644
> --- a/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/arm/gic.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>   * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.
>   */
>  #include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <util.h>
>  #include <asm/setup.h>
>  #include <asm/processor.h>
>  #include <asm/gic.h>
> @@ -28,6 +29,8 @@ struct gic {
>  
>  static struct gic *gic;
>  static int acked[NR_CPUS], spurious[NR_CPUS];
> +static int bad_sender[NR_CPUS], bad_irq[NR_CPUS];
> +static int cmdl_sender = 1, cmdl_irq = 1;
>  static cpumask_t ready;
>  
>  static void nr_cpu_check(int nr)
> @@ -43,10 +46,23 @@ static void wait_on_ready(void)
>  		cpu_relax();
>  }
>  
> +static void stats_reset(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; ++i) {
> +		acked[i] = 0;
> +		bad_sender[i] = -1;
> +		bad_irq[i] = -1;
> +	}
> +	smp_wmb();
> +}
> +
>  static void check_acked(cpumask_t *mask)
>  {
>  	int missing = 0, extra = 0, unexpected = 0;
>  	int nr_pass, cpu, i;
> +	bool bad = false;
>  
>  	/* Wait up to 5s for all interrupts to be delivered */
>  	for (i = 0; i < 50; ++i) {
> @@ -56,9 +72,21 @@ static void check_acked(cpumask_t *mask)
>  			smp_rmb();
>  			nr_pass += cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask) ?
>  				acked[cpu] == 1 : acked[cpu] == 0;
> +
> +			if (bad_sender[cpu] != -1) {
> +				printf("cpu%d received IPI from wrong sender %d\n",
> +					cpu, bad_sender[cpu]);
> +				bad = true;
> +			}
> +
> +			if (bad_irq[cpu] != -1) {
> +				printf("cpu%d received wrong irq %d\n",
> +					cpu, bad_irq[cpu]);
> +				bad = true;
> +			}
>  		}
>  		if (nr_pass == nr_cpus) {
> -			report("Completed in %d ms", true, ++i * 100);
> +			report("Completed in %d ms", !bad, ++i * 100);
>  			return;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -91,6 +119,22 @@ static void check_spurious(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void check_ipi_sender(u32 irqstat)
> +{
> +	if (gic_version() == 2) {
> +		int src = (irqstat >> 10) & 7;
> +
> +		if (src != cmdl_sender)
> +			bad_sender[smp_processor_id()] = src;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void check_irqnr(u32 irqnr)
> +{
> +	if (irqnr != (u32)cmdl_irq)
> +		bad_irq[smp_processor_id()] = irqnr;
> +}
> +
>  static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>  {
>  	u32 irqstat = gic_read_iar();
> @@ -98,8 +142,10 @@ static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>  
>  	if (irqnr != GICC_INT_SPURIOUS) {
>  		gic_write_eoir(irqstat);
> -		smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb in ipi_test functions */
> +		smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb in stats_reset */
>  		++acked[smp_processor_id()];
> +		check_ipi_sender(irqstat);
> +		check_irqnr(irqnr);
>  		smp_wmb(); /* pairs with rmb in check_acked */
>  	} else {
>  		++spurious[smp_processor_id()];
> @@ -109,19 +155,19 @@ static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>  
>  static void gicv2_ipi_send_self(void)
>  {
> -	writel(2 << 24, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
> +	writel(2 << 24 | cmdl_irq, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
>  }
>  
> -static void gicv2_ipi_send_tlist(cpumask_t *mask, int irq __unused)
> +static void gicv2_ipi_send_tlist(cpumask_t *mask, int irq)
>  {
>  	u8 tlist = (u8)cpumask_bits(mask)[0];
>  
> -	writel(tlist << 16, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
> +	writel(tlist << 16 | irq, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
>  }
>  
>  static void gicv2_ipi_send_broadcast(void)
>  {
> -	writel(1 << 24, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
> +	writel(1 << 24 | cmdl_irq, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
>  }
>  
>  static void gicv3_ipi_send_self(void)
> @@ -130,12 +176,12 @@ static void gicv3_ipi_send_self(void)
>  
>  	cpumask_clear(&mask);
>  	cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
> -	gicv3_ipi_send_tlist(&mask, 0);
> +	gicv3_ipi_send_tlist(&mask, cmdl_irq);
>  }
>  
>  static void gicv3_ipi_send_broadcast(void)
>  {
> -	gicv3_write_sgi1r(1ULL << 40);
> +	gicv3_write_sgi1r(1ULL << 40 | cmdl_irq << 24);
>  	isb();
>  }
>  
> @@ -144,10 +190,9 @@ static void ipi_test_self(void)
>  	cpumask_t mask;
>  
>  	report_prefix_push("self");
> -	memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
> -	smp_wmb();
> +	stats_reset();
>  	cpumask_clear(&mask);
> -	cpumask_set_cpu(0, &mask);
> +	cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
>  	gic->ipi.send_self();
>  	check_acked(&mask);
>  	report_prefix_pop();
> @@ -159,20 +204,18 @@ static void ipi_test_smp(void)
>  	int i;
>  
>  	report_prefix_push("target-list");
> -	memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
> -	smp_wmb();
> +	stats_reset();
>  	cpumask_copy(&mask, &cpu_present_mask);
> -	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i += 2)
> +	for (i = smp_processor_id() & 1; i < nr_cpus; i += 2)
>  		cpumask_clear_cpu(i, &mask);
> -	gic->ipi.send_tlist(&mask, 0);
> +	gic->ipi.send_tlist(&mask, cmdl_irq);
>  	check_acked(&mask);
>  	report_prefix_pop();
>  
>  	report_prefix_push("broadcast");
> -	memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
> -	smp_wmb();
> +	stats_reset();
>  	cpumask_copy(&mask, &cpu_present_mask);
> -	cpumask_clear_cpu(0, &mask);
> +	cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
>  	gic->ipi.send_broadcast();
>  	check_acked(&mask);
>  	report_prefix_pop();
> @@ -189,6 +232,16 @@ static void ipi_enable(void)
>  	local_irq_enable();
>  }
>  
> +static void ipi_send(void)
> +{
> +	ipi_enable();
> +	wait_on_ready();
> +	ipi_test_self();
> +	ipi_test_smp();
> +	check_spurious();
> +	exit(report_summary());
> +}
> +
>  static void ipi_recv(void)
>  {
>  	ipi_enable();
> @@ -197,6 +250,14 @@ static void ipi_recv(void)
>  		wfi();
>  }
>  
> +static void ipi_test(void)
> +{
> +	if (smp_processor_id() == cmdl_sender)
> +		ipi_send();
> +	else
> +		ipi_recv();
> +}
> +
>  static struct gic gicv2 = {
>  	.ipi = {
>  		.send_self = gicv2_ipi_send_self,
> @@ -242,21 +303,34 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		report_prefix_pop();
>  
>  	} else if (strcmp(argv[1], "ipi") == 0) {
> +		int off, i = 1;
> +		long val;
>  
>  		report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
>  		nr_cpu_check(2);
>  
> +		while (--argc != 1) {
> +			off = parse_keyval(argv[++i], &val);
> +			if (off == -1)
> +				continue;
> +			argv[i][off] = '\0';
> +			if (strcmp(argv[i], "sender") == 0) {
> +				if (val >= nr_cpus)
> +					report_abort("invalid sender %d, nr_cpus=%d", val, nr_cpus);
> +				cmdl_sender = val;
> +			} else if (strcmp(argv[i], "irq") == 0) {
> +				if (val > 15)
> +					report_abort("irq (SGI) must be < 16");
> +				cmdl_irq = val;
> +			}
wrong arg could potentially be tested.

Besides
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>

Eric

> +		}
> +
>  		for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
>  			if (cpu == 0)
>  				continue;
> -			smp_boot_secondary(cpu, ipi_recv);
> +			smp_boot_secondary(cpu, ipi_test);
>  		}
> -		ipi_enable();
> -		wait_on_ready();
> -		ipi_test_self();
> -		ipi_test_smp();
> -		check_spurious();
> -		report_prefix_pop();
> +		ipi_test();
>  
>  	} else {
>  		report_abort("Unknown subtest '%s'", argv[1]);
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-23 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-14 21:08 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 00/11] arm/arm64: add gic framework Andrew Jones
2016-11-14 21:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 01/11] lib: xstr: allow multiple args Andrew Jones
2016-11-14 21:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 02/11] arm64: fix get_"sysreg32" and make MPIDR 64bit Andrew Jones
2016-11-14 21:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 03/11] arm/arm64: smp: support more than 8 cpus Andrew Jones
2016-11-23 10:38   ` Auger Eric
2016-11-14 21:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 04/11] arm/arm64: add some delay routines Andrew Jones
2016-11-14 21:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 05/11] arm/arm64: irq enable/disable Andrew Jones
2016-11-14 21:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 06/11] arm/arm64: add initial gicv2 support Andrew Jones
2016-11-23 10:38   ` Auger Eric
2016-11-14 21:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 07/11] arm/arm64: gicv2: add an IPI test Andrew Jones
2016-11-14 21:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 08/11] libcflat: add IS_ALIGNED() macro, and page sizes Andrew Jones
2016-11-23 10:38   ` Auger Eric
2016-11-14 21:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 09/11] arm/arm64: add initial gicv3 support Andrew Jones
2016-11-23 10:38   ` Auger Eric
2016-11-14 21:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 10/11] arm/arm64: gicv3: add an IPI test Andrew Jones
2016-11-23 11:05   ` Auger Eric
2016-11-23 12:57     ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Jones
2016-11-14 21:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 11/11] arm/arm64: gic: don't just use zero Andrew Jones
2016-11-23 11:28   ` Auger Eric [this message]
2016-11-23 13:01     ` Andrew Jones
2016-11-23 13:33       ` Auger Eric
2016-11-23 13:46         ` Andrew Jones
2016-11-22 18:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 00/11] arm/arm64: add gic framework Andrew Jones
2016-11-23  9:55   ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-23 10:09   ` Alex Bennée
2016-11-23 11:33     ` Auger Eric
2016-11-23 13:08       ` Andrew Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=90b580c8-e797-9da7-ebe7-e76719427535@redhat.com \
    --to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox