From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB74B7B for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 08:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DFC9C433C1; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 08:25:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1670055917; bh=Wqok4FHLhgxXM4mLQpg+789IGSwx4hU/a/ecXqnHTBo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YqWdmKNF+vpsB+YsEkhgH/PO0OaRRLBj2l3oLf8sO6z39YFmsmJay//cLXdFIvZFj yAbdt53DoMgC9u6UdIQiNovfKNwJGTMKRsVKut60ZYMXTmHCJaXlwpuouCPrc3pI7E Bf4r4FkPpRdK3PWR4AvmHvU4an8DkeE/4OYMuXQM9FGKX+gl0Y7+cFiFKLVkoqdW+K I/XgtWTonvCo0y7zH6539eNPLQp21YJUQnJFJK+2D0UmaFzXbz6pDvF+CBi0Ow/Ew7 TkwxggSGaIU9eSAM5FxEGBl7lbfvF5efY/mquBvPq0PpLYXDNPW8KvPxiWVO7evmQ9 MZPCi8+cYdUVA== Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 09:25:10 +0100 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Mark Brown , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Sami Mujawar , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] arm64/nmi: Support for FEAT_NMI Message-ID: References: <20221112151708.175147-1-broonie@kernel.org> <87edthtzoz.wl-maz@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87edthtzoz.wl-maz@kernel.org> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 06:42:20PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 15:16:54 +0000, > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > This series enables the architecture and GIC support for the arm64 > > FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI extensions in host kernels. These introduce > > support for a new category of interrupts in the architecture code which > > we can use to provide NMI like functionality, though the interrupts are > > in fact maskable as the name would not imply. The GIC support was done > > by Loreozo Pieralisi. > > FWIW, I have stashed a rework of my 2 year old vgic NMI series at > [1]. It hasn't broken non-NMI behaviour in my early testing, but my > FVP is out of commission for the time being. Thanks Marc, I will test the changes and update the ones I made already accordingly, I should be able to do that next week I have been sick but things are on the mend. Lorenzo > > What could possibly go wrong? > > M. > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/log/?h=arm64/nmi > > -- > Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel