From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6144C433FE for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3262C61101 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 17:42:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3262C61101 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973934B174; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:42:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dP0M4FrAV1aW; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:42:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A3B4B18A; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:42:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB984B199 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:42:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nsgZ5ytAxVZ1 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:42:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-pj1-f47.google.com (mail-pj1-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896C84B174 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:42:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pj1-f47.google.com with SMTP id g13-20020a17090a3c8d00b00196286963b9so2004477pjc.3 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:42:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=40HbNUxcF+T20RK2OUdw+aYb/8oENTKJgMKoFCUo07c=; b=s6OYBqLpD3/j1aEyb93Oh8WoZXc+VKDanEf2q6xWzGDc28ZW0Em6Bdij9R1Fg+Li2y MkdcevWyPzSOePZVZitqkjOcjZXy+mKNnVl+L21B3xAsNBcfYIAmjZWyvtzqb7OPSRgx 6ZalvZ6QBpLxwizuU23OJrYaLb9W4bV670XhpQ4kJGSeOX1J3YH5v2sLwCuRXjHfm40u vzyijciJrEDSITEwzb9clo5E9cVu4p5LqVQzYRx0aQ71DjEtdfF4yvfyhE5lGnO8sAxo ekzpK6FoTWsKTfrLJ2vY+8GxM1ePtqe6gcRUFb81EiGCvVh+OyXA58Bz/YzBfZxlBxDH 01Vw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=40HbNUxcF+T20RK2OUdw+aYb/8oENTKJgMKoFCUo07c=; b=PsSzxPAwHm4ynXkLCm0lRe0u2uOO3LLPwpn7X0v6glOS6+XujDBS2wlz/oll14tXEK pDhAC8DlTbuGyHSwbDWEoQpkDqtjD7tMwhywY0nNLVEhKCtO0VNs1J7LiUWZl5JSl50R iwiROIowzROU8F6rnfFB8rS2N2+kD53xhN50JZ/A9h6+dBZH//OXTth9wTp5ThW4PHpl MnH+SmOsWS3laq7CYVUGTuOW8LwslINhKxGHIb2zLHj/qF1zKdHYLGhUYULsZyokY/Yt eyn1oYG5WhZoUiVKVSJwifZI2qNWNpmP9VYwnwsSBQYuSVIYDRwm18t7ssT5IWF+Gg9K l+zw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ulM8JWwXDsClS442vR5IwWitSGJvQvM9nTOpZ4lX9NvAdOH6M IZjkcltl7kHrgWzfvO0jKOc1Lg4T2PjJbg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3Z+k1SXGfmZnqwU2YMASZrpPO/JbNt4ygiAWP7MBg8vyQqvf59hmDoq/FcStuiIFOcTTabw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1d83:: with SMTP id pf3mr5363746pjb.158.1631036525474; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:42:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (150.12.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.12.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q18sm11606686pfj.46.2021.09.07.10.42.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:42:01 -0700 From: Ricardo Koller To: Oliver Upton Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 Message-ID: References: <20210903231154.25091-1-ricarkol@google.com> <20210903231154.25091-3-ricarkol@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, pshier@google.com, Paolo Bonzini , maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 09:39:12AM -0500, Oliver Upton wrote: > Ricardo, > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:12 PM Ricardo Koller wrote: > > > > Add memslot_perf_test and memslot_modification_stress_test to the list > > of aarch64 selftests. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller > > There isn't anything that prevents these tests from being used for > s390x too right? Of course, we haven't anything to test on but just a > thought. Tbh I'm not sure. Will ask if somebody can try it in the cover letter for v2. Thanks, Ricardo > > Besides Drew's comments: > > Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm