From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B356AC433EF for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A77610C8 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:30:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 31A77610C8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAF94B177; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:30:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4F5+EYJjquky; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:30:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FDB4B0F4; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:30:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4624B0C0 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:30:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M4f9fWX3h4rF for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:30:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-pf1-f177.google.com (mail-pf1-f177.google.com [209.85.210.177]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B8304B0BE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:30:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf1-f177.google.com with SMTP id o133so3050737pfg.7 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:30:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8HVWDdXXt0AD/xSFizk+AYjOVZmIDbS9XwzvKXYRSt8=; b=OEfG9fsgSPXFsuD00eYA/4hb/4nOJhqt3Fa3DsCVNZsfitbSN/e7Fn81m4qSyNF6U/ mhh/R9TUBiF7pjmngLNdEADzgfxtm/aVHY0H9J+z6ozxZ49ZZu8j36ZA8vNS+jc3P4K8 39l9ZJZa9RV8xzTd4Pq6XBto9wKnNJruu9xTNPgxAnhf+lq+LyLyNX9Nl8mvXteW2N67 +TcMWmCTLvtk136TTAc8/TraiE87+QKjoC7eTJ2OAuWqRKMp2hqkYHzHc/UrtgHJUjNB S90jgPj6NxctTlEeFg16F+/ojMD4VkEXJciV+yM/BHrhD9Juzesc0Jpe/IsL5krJCSuw Hz+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8HVWDdXXt0AD/xSFizk+AYjOVZmIDbS9XwzvKXYRSt8=; b=vbC9uQgJ7rEZ/Bk1kK/9GwXOkGnrD4R0zpQ7ujANXnWHiVYChZmIgXcxmBl9D6KKkE /jJUHaMYJ77OnhLdnI9lcHxr6obs35d1eqNyiQE5Stux7kaumgiPEnB69WXPtxVGUDe3 HkSRdBLbIY4ADGekqgY2+Es9zcWJKrYIxni3XyCgnHtdEs+fd/6GIw4xfV5lVDQ8GP8y qdRtYTIxnInBNW8M0nXOKUM/H+1hW2v+ubGmC0OTC2KpBJUX7Ilo9H2/UYPVBsVrGY7l uSPt/JihlBphVBQzkMqkV4T+Py4dS2wF2XAF87P+Umm1l4SZi/uMgG6OISYmCj13ZMpi q9dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VNB5UjzdayACYUQt4Gl+CRKLIIg7r1VpPMRF0nwbp3YLjBwN8 8DOTYX8YPsNXBOJF9PamutNZug== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZ0e6i7j4AtLY0aYMSXG5aUrKCFCUTxCqVHzekft57NleHTTPCd6QukrG2yYLrBLX5jK+rLA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:698a:: with SMTP id e132mr24303698pgc.434.1635348638933; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm180048pge.48.2021.10.27.08.30.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:30:34 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 40/43] KVM: VMX: Wake vCPU when delivering posted IRQ even if vCPU == this vCPU Message-ID: References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211009021236.4122790-41-seanjc@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Cornelia Huck , Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Atish Patra , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Claudio Imbrenda , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Janosch Frank , Marc Zyngier , Joerg Roedel , Huacai Chen , Christian Borntraeger , Aleksandar Markovic , Albert Ou , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley , David Matlack , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jim Mattson , Anup Patel , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 09/10/21 04:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > > Lastly, this aligns the non-nested and nested usage of triggering posted > > interrupts, and will allow for additional cleanups. > > It also aligns with SVM a little bit more (especially given patch 35), > doesn't it? Yes, aligning VMX and SVM APICv behavior as much as possible is definitely a goal of this series, though I suspect I failed to state that anywhere. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm