From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4C3C433EF for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 01:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863B861242 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 01:21:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 863B861242 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0CA4B1A9; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:21:17 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qxkUOPf+61zK; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:21:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88BD4B16C; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:21:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D9C4B125 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:21:14 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a1X1tE1K7bsb for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:21:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-pf1-f181.google.com (mail-pf1-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93CAB4B11F for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:21:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pf1-f181.google.com with SMTP id m26so17833371pff.3 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:21:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=xrX5PIQ5N2CnAG0B54w4TYQMlOw3gRJk552Ipp+ebKw=; b=Stz43RdVom5q6hSvN+LnhdAH1B5D0RUDmznyrJp0pQFRjJeWUrzR/udLPaY2tilNCt XcgrdLFIIf2+mR8m54M6dT+Dbrc35be5RRM9b9uL9pOdJ4j7hQwoxKcdUZiCi2W8rFeo mmXBUYtpY4TQWJozh8/OxpMOOMnVYCLM8GwnYcFgDNGHVKOZqBpYEqqfKv0BxApaEO6w QHgCpUm2hA6iGp0NqZEk59gkrY4Hh/+mLGmE93ORS8+YVRoDiSXYWhEz8HkG7mLHejSo f65DHHDi9o/I209K1+WG4QDyN4k9mmBRl/VShVuSsU+pG0yGr+qfqYoTiN2J1n0hf0oV 3pUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=xrX5PIQ5N2CnAG0B54w4TYQMlOw3gRJk552Ipp+ebKw=; b=AWhCRQxo2oLJOJfUyLKLDkuybVkWTOVYBVnMdYwBfs0xYZ1IvUXv4ulcsVzWgZYtTf xaqD6CvGeQZInXXVCQiGIDXerdUuBZK8O2d8jLfimcG1/XFhUxtgqnb5Axcie1fiU1md 4p0Kz95pyscr5/v7r9SUX/7VUwkfAcL2iFc5Tz1g/WzDv8pBfk2kbGR2snw1vCDR6RE1 d/vHDGZcl6V/vUzYFf0XIpvqAvzwITSKgOG9IJMx4TpS/itYhDqYb/AzBuvNl6xitOMG 0UAM6L63H5ywFdhLU7pNp5yjvqV81ZvvNjLOZaP0jAH/tk0WW8jMIJ1v7Ppxh0t7gLaw ULcw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vknOeRewJV3BK9Sl5l7rcEghrJ/0ne7PGr4xBbW6bog1Dbcub KmfT/FP6ky9axaX8rQH/ai8hOA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzT4cwDWE/OiPQTr+XYp5T2lNnL8iaG9fSc3ur50OFq8TyJ/z2y4+XiWK6EYq8MqHpQV5QIIA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:8a4a:: with SMTP id y71mr2992478pgd.378.1636420872463; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:21:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t13sm11751282pfl.214.2021.11.08.17.21.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:21:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 01:21:07 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.5 00/30] KVM: Scalable memslots implementation Message-ID: References: <20211104002531.1176691-1-seanjc@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Anup Patel , Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Atish Patra , Ben Gardon , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Claudio Imbrenda , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Janosch Frank , Marc Zyngier , Joerg Roedel , Huacai Chen , Christian Borntraeger , Aleksandar Markovic , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jim Mattson , Cornelia Huck , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Tue, Nov 09, 2021, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > On 04.11.2021 01:25, Sean Christopherson wrote: > By the way, do you want your patches and my non-invasive patches (patches > below number 23) merged without waiting for the rest of the series to be > fully ready? > > This way there is less risk of conflicting changes to KVM being merged > in meantime while we are still discussing the remaining patches. > Or worse - changes that don't conflict but subtly break some assumptions > that the code relies on. > > For this reason I am strongly for merging them independently from the > more invasive parts. Merging them as soon as they're ready would also be my preference. That said, I'm hoping we can get the entire implemenation queued up for 5.17 sooner than later. I'll do my best to respond quickly to try and make that happen. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm