From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7872AC433F5 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 18:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D972540C29; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 13:43:35 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f7gJDeyfvKGo; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 13:43:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B1340F9C; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 13:43:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6B740C29 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 13:43:33 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYReS0LvRjeP for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 13:43:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com (mail-pg1-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA0B140417 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 13:43:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id p125so266429pga.2 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 10:43:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=SDBZmOfzCxzCugk5jd7ddO5i086r0OhAAAxVBt9bcn4=; b=oCI/z/rsP2tCXkQEN/+3HjveKSrAnKOcocJwYaxxXbEW1w/eYlt67jmoJECImLXl6Y m+naw7bWdoJmdRnn10lDq1HpA2C5Az22TBA6yOAyuycAtgvmvSp/UQeky9h/lq03T2xw lFjkXkSHdF4LLPF0HB4gynXj3rNLfI65rrGnjcnuUumbMu6jj8AaMwam+iUKe7nJpgCo iYbJCIHr1SG2YFaExtqHyGZ7n/VHGIJmWCAeqACFxUBHAO5mxQNGVKviHVdOY7eknFJ4 iKjM6a0XZmYtrfGna/2nc/lbsI0MgMcoJPezmgMWAFHDODU9wJXJBWHksMfgYyj917xU GB0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=SDBZmOfzCxzCugk5jd7ddO5i086r0OhAAAxVBt9bcn4=; b=bBzLdWvXj9gbQODI4rzqS9vMZ451p3FLmmWbqrV05xqs1JR2deCXdO7NYe77Io0z7t Rar5nK4b00AhzQ4FrHM8PYahqd7orBcGwwY0Tv8lwdcvtFJOdI4TgR5ys0fiUXYQtvBV 2wtmy4Y8Ny/bgjYLrvJ+rf5QWBhD99ujyGB/5oM+YyyOT12KMUg6LPZCYvAqihyaEJ1s cC6eRDxxrBPl97hjOX9tUR6QPXYZsygqUQedPsjshywDJ0eB97iYCZbR97UhX/ifUE3J djFvwf2bC7EoLdh0WPVvRT8FPcH05rJhEiLOQb62IXsgWdpDgM8q0VxIo2Qqfts0DbCS S1cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532O7w3u3xvgDYVwAWXIsPS9iVUIL+YlVdWNL8PW7u5MuElHD0PR HIKk+NH4q8P7F+re2cFc0XpRug== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKY2bmBpNsgwyDJ0PlfhIstJxwGXU5jBuEN8xCwoW4q9qfWAOqxr1alAqmED6qNrXosDZfnA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9682:: with SMTP id f2mr31230350pfk.56.1643827410811; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p22sm26858049pfo.163.2022.02.02.10.43.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 18:43:26 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/17] perf/core: Use static_call to optimize perf_guest_info_callbacks Message-ID: References: <20211111020738.2512932-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211111020738.2512932-10-seanjc@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211111020738.2512932-10-seanjc@google.com> Cc: Will McVicker , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sami Tolvanen , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu +Will and Sami, -most everyone else On Thu, Nov 11, 2021, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Use static_call to optimize perf's guest callbacks on arm64 and x86, > which are now the only architectures that define the callbacks. Use > DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0 as the default/NULL for all guest callbacks, as > the callback semantics are that a return value '0' means "not in guest". > > static_call obviously avoids the overhead of CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y, but is > also advantageous versus other solutions, e.g. per-cpu callbacks, in that > a per-cpu memory load is not needed to detect the !guest case. > > Based on code from Peter and Like. > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > Cc: Like Xu > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > --- ... > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c > index 1c8d341ecc77..b4fd928e4ff8 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/core.c > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c > @@ -6524,12 +6524,23 @@ static void perf_pending_event(struct irq_work *entry) > #ifdef CONFIG_GUEST_PERF_EVENTS > struct perf_guest_info_callbacks __rcu *perf_guest_cbs; > > +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0(__perf_guest_state, *perf_guest_cbs->state); > +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0(__perf_guest_get_ip, *perf_guest_cbs->get_ip); > +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0(__perf_guest_handle_intel_pt_intr, *perf_guest_cbs->handle_intel_pt_intr); Using __static_call_return0() makes clang's CFI sad on arm64 due to the resulting function prototype mistmatch, which IIUC, is verified by clang's __cfi_check() for indirect calls, i.e. architectures without CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL. We could fudge around the issue by using stubs, massaging prototypes, etc..., but that means doing that for every arch-agnostic user of __static_call_return0(). Any clever ideas? Can we do something like generate a unique function for every DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_RET0 for CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL=n, e.g. using typeof() to get the prototype? Kernel panic - not syncing: CFI failure (target: __static_call_return0+0x0/0x8) CPU: 0 PID: 1625 Comm: batterystats-wo Tainted: G W OE 5.16.0-mainline #1$ Hardware name: Raven EVT 1.1 (DT)$ Call trace:$ dump_backtrace+0xf0/0x130$ show_stack+0x1c/0x2c$ dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x98$ panic+0x168/0x420$ __cfi_check_fail+0x58/0x5c$ __cfi_slowpath_diag+0x150/0x1a4$ perf_misc_flags+0x74/0xa4$ perf_prepare_sample+0x50/0x44c$ perf_event_output_forward+0x5c/0xcc$ __perf_event_overflow+0xc8/0x188$ perf_swevent_event+0x7c/0x10c$ perf_tp_event+0x168/0x298$ perf_trace_run_bpf_submit+0x8c/0xdc$ perf_trace_sched_switch+0x180/0x1cc$ __schedule+0x850/0x924$ schedule+0x98/0xe0$ binder_wait_for_work+0x158/0x368$ binder_thread_read+0x278/0x243c$ binder_ioctl_write_read+0x120/0x45c$ binder_ioctl+0x1ac/0xc34$ __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xa8/0x118$ invoke_syscall+0x64/0x178$ el0_svc_common+0x8c/0x100$ do_el0_svc+0x28/0xa0$ el0_svc+0x24/0x84$ el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec$ el0t_64_sync+0x1b4/0x1b8$ _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm