Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Fixing chained events, and PMUv3p5 support
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:46:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvP8/m9uDI2PcyoP@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220805135813.2102034-1-maz@kernel.org>

On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Ricardo recently reported[1] that our PMU emulation was busted when it
> comes to chained events, as we cannot expose the overflow on a 32bit
> boundary (which the architecture requires).
> 
> This series aims at fixing this (by deleting a lot of code), and as a
> bonus adds support for PMUv3p5, as this requires us to fix a few more
> things.
> 
> Tested on A53 (PMUv3) and FVP (PMUv3p5).
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220805004139.990531-1-ricarkol@google.com
> 
> Marc Zyngier (9):
>   KVM: arm64: PMU: Align chained counter implementation with
>     architecture pseudocode
>   KVM: arm64: PMU: Distinguish between 64bit counter and 64bit overflow
>   KVM: arm64: PMU: Only narrow counters that are not 64bit wide
>   KVM: arm64: PMU: Add counter_index_to_*reg() helpers
>   KVM: arm64: PMU: Simplify setting a counter to a specific value
>   KVM: arm64: PMU: Move the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver limit to VM creation
>   KVM: arm64: PMU: Aleven ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver to be set from userspace
>   KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement PMUv3p5 long counter support
>   KVM: arm64: PMU: Aleven PMUv3p5 to be exposed to the guest
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |   6 +
>  arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c         | 372 ++++++++++--------------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         |  65 +++++-
>  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h             |  16 +-
>  5 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Hi Marc,

There is one extra potential issue with exposing PMUv3p5. I see this
weird behavior when doing passthrough ("bare metal") on the fast-model
configured to emulate PMUv3p5: the [63:32] half of the counters
overflowing at 32-bits is still incremented.

  Fast model - ARMv8.5:
   
	Assuming the initial state is even=0xFFFFFFFF and odd=0x0,
	incrementing the even counter leads to:

	0x00000001_00000000	0x00000000_00000001		0x1
	even counter		odd counter			PMOVSET

	Assuming the initial state is even=0xFFFFFFFF and odd=0xFFFFFFFF,
	incrementing the even counter leads to:

	0x00000001_00000000	0x00000001_00000000		0x3
	even counter		odd counter			PMOVSET

More specifically, the pmu-chained-sw-incr kvm-unit-test fails when
doing passthrough of PMUv3p5 (fast model - ARMv8.5):

  INFO: PMU version: 0x5
  INFO: PMU implementer/ID code: 0x41("A")/0
  INFO: Implements 8 event counters
  PASS: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow and chain counter incremented after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN
  INFO: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow=0x1, #0=4294967380 #1=1
                                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                                #0=0x00000001_00000054
                                                #1=0x00000000_00000001
  FAIL: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: expected overflows and values after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN
  INFO: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow=0x3, #0=4294967380 #1=4294967296
                                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                                  #0=0x00000001_00000054
                                                  #1=0x00000001_00000000

There's really no good use for this behavior, and not sure if it's worth
emulating it. Can't find any reference in the ARM ARM.

Thanks,
Ricardo
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-10 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-05 13:58 [PATCH 0/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Fixing chained events, and PMUv3p5 support Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Align chained counter implementation with architecture pseudocode Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 17:21   ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-23  4:30   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-24 10:29     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-27 14:33       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-27 15:21         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Distinguish between 64bit counter and 64bit overflow Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Only narrow counters that are not 64bit wide Marc Zyngier
2022-08-24  4:07   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Add counter_index_to_*reg() helpers Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10  7:17   ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 17:23     ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-24  4:27   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Simplify setting a counter to a specific value Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 15:41   ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Move the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver limit to VM creation Marc Zyngier
2022-08-26  4:34   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-26  6:02     ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-26 14:43       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-27 16:09         ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-27 17:24           ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver to be set from userspace Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10  7:08   ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10  9:27     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-26  7:01   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement PMUv3p5 long counter support Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10  7:16   ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10  9:28     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-27  7:09       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow PMUv3p5 to be exposed to the guest Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10  7:16   ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 18:46 ` Ricardo Koller [this message]
2022-08-10 19:33   ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Fixing chained events, and PMUv3p5 support Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 21:55     ` Ricardo Koller
2022-08-11 12:56       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-12 22:53         ` Ricardo Koller
2022-10-24 18:05           ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YvP8/m9uDI2PcyoP@google.com \
    --to=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox