From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, oupton@google.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, dmatlack@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, qperret@google.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev,
seanjc@google.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, reijiw@google.com,
rananta@google.com, bgardon@google.com, ricarkol@gmail.com,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split()
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 13:32:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEREWWIMEduE4jBF@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef8ec8d0-51d9-0971-395e-04d035e948fe@redhat.com>
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:38:06PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On 4/9/23 2:29 PM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > Add a new stage2 function, kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(), for splitting a
> > range of huge pages. This will be used for eager-splitting huge pages
> > into PAGE_SIZE pages. The goal is to avoid having to split huge pages
> > on write-protection faults, and instead use this function to do it
> > ahead of time for large ranges (e.g., all guest memory in 1G chunks at
> > a time).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 19 +++++
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 122 insertions(+)
> >
>
> With the following nits addressed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> > index c8e0e7d9303b2..32e5d42bf020f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> > @@ -653,6 +653,25 @@ bool kvm_pgtable_stage2_is_young(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr);
> > */
> > int kvm_pgtable_stage2_flush(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size);
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() - Split a range of huge pages into leaf PTEs pointing
> > + * to PAGE_SIZE guest pages.
> > + * @pgt: Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_stage2_init().
> > + * @addr: Intermediate physical address from which to split.
> > + * @size: Size of the range.
> > + * @mc: Cache of pre-allocated and zeroed memory from which to allocate
> ^^^^^^^^
> Alignment.
>
Same as in the previous commit. This is due to the added "+ " in the
diff. The line looks aligned without it.
> > + * page-table pages.
> > + *
> > + * The function tries to split any level 1 or 2 entry that overlaps
> > + * with the input range (given by @addr and @size).
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure. Note that
> > + * kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() is best effort: it tries to break as many
> > + * blocks in the input range as allowed by @mc_capacity.
> > + */
> > +int kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
> > + struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
> > +
> > /**
> > * kvm_pgtable_walk() - Walk a page-table.
> > * @pgt: Page-table structure initialised by kvm_pgtable_*_init().
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > index 477d2be67d401..48c5a95c6e8cd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > @@ -1272,6 +1272,109 @@ kvm_pte_t *kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt,
> > return pgtable;
> > }
> > +/*
> > + * Get the number of page-tables needed to replace a block with a
> > + * fully populated tree up to the PTE entries. Note that @level is
> > + * interpreted as in "level @level entry".
> > + */
> > +static int stage2_block_get_nr_page_tables(u32 level)
> > +{
> > + switch (level) {
> > + case 1:
> > + return PTRS_PER_PTE + 1;
> > + case 2:
> > + return 1;
> > + case 3:
> > + return 0;
> > + default:
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(level < KVM_PGTABLE_MIN_BLOCK_LEVEL ||
> > + level >= KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + };
> > +}
> > +
>
> When the starting level is 3, it's not a block mapping if I'm correct. Besides,
> the caller (stage2_split_walker()) bails when the starting level is 3. In this
> case, the changes may be integrated to stage2_split_walker(), which is the only
> caller. Otherwise, 'inline' is worthy to have.
>
> nr_pages = kvm_granule_shift(level) == PUD_SHIFT && kvm_granule_shift(level) != PMD_SHIFT) ?
> (PTRS_PER_PTE + 1) : 1;
>
Mind if I keep the function? It helps explaining what's going on: we
need to calculate the number of pages needed to replace a block (and how
it's done). Regarding the "inline", Marc suggested removing it as the
compiler will figure it out.
> > +static int stage2_split_walker(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
> > + enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags visit)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops = ctx->mm_ops;
> > + struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc = ctx->arg;
> > + struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu;
> > + kvm_pte_t pte = ctx->old, new, *childp;
> > + enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> > + u32 level = ctx->level;
> > + bool force_pte;
> > + int nr_pages;
> > + u64 phys;
> > +
> > + /* No huge-pages exist at the last level */
> > + if (level == KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS - 1)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* We only split valid block mappings */
> > + if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + nr_pages = stage2_block_get_nr_page_tables(level);
> > + if (nr_pages < 0)
> > + return nr_pages;
> > +
> > + if (mc->nobjs >= nr_pages) {
> > + /* Build a tree mapped down to the PTE granularity. */
> > + force_pte = true;
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * Don't force PTEs, so create_unlinked() below does
> > + * not populate the tree up to the PTE level. The
> > + * consequence is that the call will require a single
> > + * page of level 2 entries at level 1, or a single
> > + * page of PTEs at level 2. If we are at level 1, the
> > + * PTEs will be created recursively.
> > + */
> > + force_pte = false;
> > + nr_pages = 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (mc->nobjs < nr_pages)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + mmu = container_of(mc, struct kvm_s2_mmu, split_page_cache);
> > + phys = kvm_pte_to_phys(pte);
> > + prot = kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(pte);
> > +
> > + childp = kvm_pgtable_stage2_create_unlinked(mmu->pgt, phys,
> > + level, prot, mc, force_pte);
> > + if (IS_ERR(childp))
> > + return PTR_ERR(childp);
> > +
> > + if (!stage2_try_break_pte(ctx, mmu)) {
> > + kvm_pgtable_stage2_free_unlinked(mm_ops, childp, level);
> > + mm_ops->put_page(childp);
> > + return -EAGAIN;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Note, the contents of the page table are guaranteed to be made
> > + * visible before the new PTE is assigned because stage2_make_pte()
> > + * writes the PTE using smp_store_release().
> > + */
> > + new = kvm_init_table_pte(childp, mm_ops);
> > + stage2_make_pte(ctx, new);
> > + dsb(ishst);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_pgtable_stage2_split(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
> > + struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> > + .cb = stage2_split_walker,
> > + .flags = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> > + .arg = mc,
> > + };
> > +
> > + return kvm_pgtable_walk(pgt, addr, size, &walker);
> > +}
> > +
> > int __kvm_pgtable_stage2_init(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
> > struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops *mm_ops,
> > enum kvm_pgtable_stage2_flags flags,
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-22 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-09 6:29 [PATCH v7 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] KVM: arm64: Rename free_removed to free_unlinked Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 6:08 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK ctx->flags for skipping BBM and CMO Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 6:10 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK flags for skipping CMOs and BBM TLBIs Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 6:13 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] KVM: arm64: Add helper for creating unlinked stage2 subtrees Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 6:18 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-22 20:09 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-04-22 20:32 ` Oliver Upton
2023-04-22 20:37 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-04-23 6:55 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() Ricardo Koller
2023-04-09 9:36 ` kernel test robot
2023-04-10 17:40 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 6:38 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-22 20:32 ` Ricardo Koller [this message]
2023-04-23 6:58 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 6:41 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-23 19:47 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 6:42 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu() Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 6:44 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] KVM: arm64: Export kvm_are_all_memslots_empty() Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 6:47 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 7:04 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-23 20:27 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-04-24 11:14 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-24 18:48 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 7:11 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] KVM: arm64: Open-code kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked() Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 7:14 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-09 6:29 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 7:18 ` Gavin Shan
2023-04-09 6:30 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] KVM: arm64: Use local TLBI on permission relaxation Ricardo Koller
2023-04-17 7:20 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEREWWIMEduE4jBF@google.com \
--to=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@gmail.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox