From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yb1-f202.google.com (mail-yb1-f202.google.com [209.85.219.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3A08174D4 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 17:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-f202.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-bacfa4eefcbso13610171276.1 for ; Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:04:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1686071054; x=1688663054; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V8qzwnilU7CBlAyrORrX+Rq/xc7XcjCZI3HBcrsSReA=; b=AHguQPaCli0Z6Kk+CO5rYFKKfQWZY0OhpKc5L71HVklmdkvCAO1wmDuyVEKmh9ewUU ZgcNzq7xdni1a3CtugomLcW1MAII4596bWnto4+D2qqcJMKr8v3+RiRZqaYxWGrITiKm rkGNCX6ed2Fkxt9vXgOPTcvkD4SeXKKOA3SAS3b0kf65oyUIrb10oZ0EBGciPjhcmLL+ e9oArNo6WBao2TwmmH/+9C754jWjiV2QJzHYOUSQUdnIrKtz/7CiM6scXZ4Bs0yc+JFh IBuIq0PfbvSQJJboJee8nSpLJM/xi9r2FM0kQUSvVbSSJb+yDeOq59lT6kOXYeMLh0bj OUTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686071054; x=1688663054; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V8qzwnilU7CBlAyrORrX+Rq/xc7XcjCZI3HBcrsSReA=; b=glQQLwdiNfPCDptCV3cA8vO/lZJzXznZywY91ubPxPbLCCur6S1W1SRbZgAoJ6GlCx 6n06TWP5Xe/xhaPmJiL2ZWe8Z+DV9nc7kFg+X4GWRLS1jGDcOLHnDgkByl0SmwBB7twF mkSF30PnHw4AQab+o9CyjMfQulwccIgLlekiAKTzEHkq9vBQMUF+9GNtUVyau5Kj1esF hEJy/yFB/wd5+YKGsNvy/svHhhXi5DCMIDO9YknNfdyFeL5VyR88MqvZJxx1ysXLQsdi LpnpFr9t7xBJbB/ry3g/HkZ1BalB6NuRBtSU/qmmkzsT82sTkanZFxfrZAaiJ/RP56s8 oaiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyZYk1GcYTtaZ8Hdo8555MTcRT58rCMF+D/8S7oYn9JQMPId+KD 4Wb/z1JNPns1eIYn46OS4kbBV35jU74= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4qZcjvSUYMxKH7ZqKK5jG3I1bcHk8c4YCSNi3BAUw5BflMSXSLu5LCw/yiBxYmezusTpkyPX7rEy0= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:f50d:0:b0:bb1:ca0e:29a0 with SMTP id a13-20020a25f50d000000b00bb1ca0e29a0mr1657054ybe.0.1686071054799; Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 10:04:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <2f16f83e-ed60-fcb7-7f3d-0fa216c41cb9@redhat.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Fix smp_processor_id() call in preemptible context From: Sean Christopherson To: Oliver Upton Cc: Sebastian Ott , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tue, Jun 06, 2023, Oliver Upton wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 03:46:09PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > I.e. can't you just do? > > No, this would break the 'old' ABI, but if we decide to deliberately > break it I prefer your suggestion over using CPU0. Ah, if userspace pins the task when doing KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL, then factoring in the pCPU matters.