From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-15.mta0.migadu.com (out-15.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DF0DA926 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:19:16 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1686745161; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1ziofaVaQl/PXTbCpHDOShli8oK6ZMZB0tTbh4LFMVw=; b=SMO9mvVJcjYnn/P4bCdCBz3lAN2DM5NLKp00ItLTi14hFU1FT1BIpCk2cjrgwZl0xjZc1y /FofN9ECBlWroHu8kHgTRvxfS0gDNIC0hbKdjeyZrENf2Yu1A//GlFTw/U4bWtErShWk+6 /898KScKPS3+hua5w8WLamES+SvnJhI= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta Cc: Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Paolo Bonzini , Jing Zhang , Colton Lewis , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_TLBIRANGE Message-ID: References: <20230606192858.3600174-1-rananta@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230606192858.3600174-1-rananta@google.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Hi Raghavendra, On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 07:28:51PM +0000, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote: > The series is based off of upstream v6.4-rc2, and applied David > Matlack's common API for TLB invalidations[1] on top. Sorry I didn't spot the dependency earlier, but this isn't helpful TBH. David's series was partially applied, and what remains no longer cleanly applies to the base you suggest. Independent of that, my *strong* preference is that you just send out a series containing your patches as well as David's. Coordinating dependent efforts is the only sane thing to do. Also, those patches are 5 months old at this point which is ancient history. > [1]: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230126184025.2294823-1-dmatlack@google.com/ -- Thanks, Oliver