Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: vgic-v4: Consistently request doorbell irq for blocking vCPU
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 20:14:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZK8JqbLrwWE6sFSe@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86zg41utno.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:49:15PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Given that making VPE resident on the vcpu block path (i.e., in
> > kvm_vcpu_halt()) makes little sense (right?) and leads to this sort of
> > problem, a crude idea is that we can probably keep track of the
> > "nested" vgic_v4_{put,load} calls (instead of a single vpe->resident
> > flag) and keep VPE *not resident* on the whole block path (like what we
> > had before commit 8e01d9a396e6). And we then rely on
> > kvm_vcpu_wfi/vgic_v4_load to actually schedule the VPE on...
> 
> I'm not sure about the nested tracking part, but it's easy enough to
> have a vcpu flag indicating that we're in WFI. So an *alternative* to
> the current fix would be something like this:

Yeah, I like your approach better. I've gone ahead and backed out my
change and can take this instead once someone tests it out :)

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-12 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-10 17:55 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: vgic-v4: Consistently request doorbell irq for blocking vCPU Oliver Upton
2023-07-11  7:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-07-11  7:26   ` Oliver Upton
2023-07-11  7:57     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-07-12 12:09     ` Zenghui Yu
2023-07-12 13:49       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-07-12 15:56         ` Zenghui Yu
2023-07-13  2:38           ` chenxiang (M)
2023-07-12 20:14         ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2023-07-13  5:57         ` chenxiang (M)
2023-07-13  6:01           ` Oliver Upton
2023-07-13  7:11             ` Marc Zyngier
2023-07-11 20:00 ` Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZK8JqbLrwWE6sFSe@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox