From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Anish Moorthy <amoorthy@google.com>
Cc: seanjc@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
jthoughton@google.com, rananta@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Do a KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT when stage-2 fault handler EFAULTs
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 13:03:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZrKBn8I-mBJh_U8b@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF7b7mps9-HdBv52BDbAMceGuT+FRiRtpdwpK=psfW1Msvip+Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 11:44:39AM -0700, Anish Moorthy wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 4:02 PM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:40:31PM +0000, Anish Moorthy wrote:
> > > Right now userspace just gets a bare EFAULT when the stage-2 fault
> > > handler fails to fault in the relevant page. Set up a memory fault exit
> > > when this happens, which at the very least eases debugging and might
> > > also let userspace decide on/take some specific action other than
> > > crashing the VM.
> >
> > There are several other 'bare' EFAULTs remaining (unexpected fault
> > context, failed vma_lookup(), nested PTW), so the patch doesn't exactly
> > match the shortlog.
> >
> > Is there a reason why those are unaddressed? In any case, it doesn't
> > hurt to be unambiguous in the shortlog if we're only focused on this single
> > error condition, e.g.
> >
> > KVM: arm64: Do a memory fault exit if __gfn_to_pfn_memslot() fails
>
> Ah, right- forgot to address this before I sent it out.
>
> Basically: those cases you mention (besides MTE, where it seems simple
> enough to add an annotation) happen before vma_pagesize is calculated,
If the motivation is to add additional information for debugging
unexpected KVM/VMM behavior then this really ought to be addressed. You
could fall back to PAGE_SIZE, or better yet just don't report a size
whatsoever (size = 0) if it cannot be reliably determined.
Userspace probably only cares about logging @flags and @gpa before
killing the VM.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-06 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-02 22:40 [PATCH 0/3] Set up KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULTs when arm64/x86 stage-2 fault handlers fail Anish Moorthy
2024-08-02 22:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: Do a KVM_MEMORY_FAULT EXIT when stage-2 fault handler EFAULTs Anish Moorthy
2024-08-02 22:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Declare support for KVM_CAP_MEMORY_FAULT_INFO Anish Moorthy
2024-08-05 22:51 ` Oliver Upton
2024-08-06 18:14 ` Anish Moorthy
2024-08-06 19:44 ` Oliver Upton
2024-08-07 14:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 17:57 ` Oliver Upton
2024-08-02 22:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Do a KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT when stage-2 fault handler EFAULTs Anish Moorthy
2024-08-05 23:02 ` Oliver Upton
2024-08-06 18:44 ` Anish Moorthy
2024-08-06 20:03 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZrKBn8I-mBJh_U8b@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox