From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f202.google.com (mail-pl1-f202.google.com [209.85.214.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29AC2311C2F for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 16:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.202 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776444427; cv=none; b=akA07CRKGW6tpRdJxA0HMRsubMKDOVwcw9uHL3jPnPdpwujcNx3EZeYrMCFqdSqq2TWzBmLJM36MHQ5smIoHHZp5aIVbhfQ39Gou7XJ3n8fLpq54QLA4Z9w6jOt9nikI0ARjAZnT2EC21Ox/BCWfiB057d0geSRURx+5PCHWzX4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776444427; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BqkS1+8w7mYYuCnHKvtHMaYkbLA09Qinu7JMt5fNOGM=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=B7IDiFHReH5NVUYkFGeoOrHy8RVKhk3BIp/CiG8a4k8jqrUl2GQcGXunYGUc3P6eFGVN4G3WfUBmAG9ercFgL9M3WbCBx5dswQo6Hi0uClES/4bJ1DIoLZ4d93s4800if2P/PSU6dfAh8eL9vxSEf/xoNrCtL3+pZg0YIYUW354= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=bryMiH+N; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.202 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="bryMiH+N" Received: by mail-pl1-f202.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2b2ecc96a9aso9497675ad.1 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 09:47:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1776444425; x=1777049225; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=THZKYqCh3zVO+So/kaXQTTcEeZfZWD5YDDISxc7lZyg=; b=bryMiH+NwmOwJQlb3djxFYD9xoElRl8OUV6zbHnIaeqyqS8LybKkO+X4/iVLpucJ2u vF/aLli6WgvtMz/qQM47mV8mxyDDYj+Q8vpkCZuWbKLFbjt9bIFZcDLu/f8oz4S4zrLk +o0rOBOGfq7IPak4qU8eRnRAT6o20YBZHm4WUu2F5mrltYaut9AT0gYlq3ppJqt42JAv SgW9ne/sQuHv1z+MIVCj3WmKa6NDq77yBiX8Lb3MRIU9uBHrGT4RcTUkw6R+D/zJ3wvC YfGG68PbYurE9BZ9+mouYXAadolKxgW/7B+UzZGEY+Aa7aEiQbmaQ5sE3tnpdZiv6K2X zdaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1776444425; x=1777049225; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=THZKYqCh3zVO+So/kaXQTTcEeZfZWD5YDDISxc7lZyg=; b=hPoC8tnmigDrambKAd2Wv2zVk70pRb4DnjYKeam96VgsOmRbPl394WSIRVM9BL/7+A mnoKobSJn0GasVJGge+3lvpQHeKCoOIhYWg9fXgwItbEOwQk4VCs9Ytdz3p1CQxU4i45 qv4Wx4jpjPS/lspZBvkDScY4HaPBPm9n9CcEn5jnDpnVr9q5ShwSmsheTHCpLhiPs71o 4zKJFaTBmECk979gVtrx8KU7+3mrqNzui0y99QkusSHtKPy5bTswiBgolFVLnICAsV// vV8W4cWaVzjEJAx1EtGu1vWTjoJskxWoazEH5WqRjZaFts32yEoXRKlVBge86YB6Ui6E TaoQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9madp2LZlDALM1AoOj3s8uoN/H5XhrO1QHagwDBIIDRjv4/8+DZPIxsksAdfYHn/4B8ZO4MK8=@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzTPpzeCrzDZztP9FrMMpzMb78qCWUIVlMI45fwQTAJ3qpNnU51 y4J/ryJI+K8MF4bwnqdAqjXRx+Vg4zdMVLSCDav26YAqGUmybPpc9d/NdlM0vYiNPjoEPTpMLH0 m5YAa0A== X-Received: from plbiw7.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:903:447:b0:2b2:46d7:4428]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:903:1ac6:b0:2b2:5840:808e with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2b5f9ee9487mr37665585ad.10.1776444425313; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 09:47:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 09:47:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <0064952b-048c-455d-ad89-e27e5cb82591@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20250729225455.670324-1-seanjc@google.com> <20250729225455.670324-25-seanjc@google.com> <0064952b-048c-455d-ad89-e27e5cb82591@linux.dev> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 24/24] KVM: selftests: Add guest_memfd testcase to fault-in on !mmap()'d memory From: Sean Christopherson To: Zenghui Yu Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ira Weiny , Gavin Shan , Shivank Garg , Vlastimil Babka , Xiaoyao Li , David Hildenbrand , Fuad Tabba , Ackerley Tng , Tao Chan , James Houghton Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Mon, Mar 30, 2026, Zenghui Yu wrote: > On 7/30/25 6:54 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Add a guest_memfd testcase to verify that a vCPU can fault-in guest_memfd > > memory that supports mmap(), but that is not currently mapped into host > > userspace and/or has a userspace address (in the memslot) that points at > > something other than the target guest_memfd range. Mapping guest_memfd > > memory into the guest is supposed to operate completely independently from > > any userspace mappings. > > + vm = __vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(VM_SHAPE_DEFAULT, &vcpu, 1, guest_code); > > + > > + TEST_ASSERT(vm_check_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD_MMAP), > > + "Default VM type should always support guest_memfd mmap()"); > > + > > + size = vm->page_size; > > + fd = vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, size, GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_MMAP); > > This test fails on arm64 when vm->page_size is 4k and host's page_size > is 64k: > > [root@localhost kvm]# ./guest_memfd_test > Random seed: 0x6b8b4567 > __vm_create: mode='PA-bits:40, VA-bits:48, 4K pages' type='0', pages='660' > ==== Test Assertion Failure ==== > include/kvm_util.h:683: fd >= 0 > pid=889 tid=889 errno=22 - Invalid argument > 1 0x000000000040262b: vm_create_guest_memfd at kvm_util.h:683 > 2 (inlined by) test_guest_memfd_guest at guest_memfd_test.c:450 > 3 (inlined by) main at guest_memfd_test.c:491 > 4 0x00007fff8f56af3b: ?? ??:0 > 5 0x00007fff8f56b007: ?? ??:0 > 6 0x0000000000402a2f: _start at ??:? > KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD failed, rc: -1 errno: 22 (Invalid argument) Does this fix things for you? If so, I'll send a proper patch. diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c index ec7644aae999..c682bda722f9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c @@ -510,9 +510,15 @@ static void test_guest_memfd_guest(void) "Default VM type should support INIT_SHARED, supported flags = 0x%x", vm_check_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD_FLAGS)); + /* + * Use the guest's page size for all accesses, e.g. to avoid having to + * map multiple pages, but create the guest_memfd instance with the max + * of the host or guest page size, as KVM requires gmem files to be + * aligned to the host page size. + */ size = vm->page_size; - fd = vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, size, GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_MMAP | - GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_INIT_SHARED); + fd = vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, max(size, page_size), GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_MMAP | + GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_INIT_SHARED); vm_set_user_memory_region2(vm, slot, KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD, gpa, size, NULL, fd, 0); mem = kvm_mmap(size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd);