From: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, tabba@google.com,
joey.gouly@arm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
imv4bel@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: nv: Don't skip VNCR invalidation when the TLB size is unknown
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 01:26:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ameGoxbn2wzBq2kL@v4bel> (raw)
ttl_to_size() returns 0 when no size is defined for the (granule, level)
pair. That is the case for level 0 with 4kB pages, and for levels 0 and 1
with 16kB and 64kB pages. For a VNCR pseudo-TLB this happens when the
guest runs with SCTLR_EL2.M cleared, because __kvm_translate_va() returns
success with wr->level left at S1_MMU_DISABLED, and that s8 value becomes
level 1 as it goes through the u8 parameter of pgshift_level_to_ttl(). The
size is then 0 if the guest has TCR_EL2.TG0 set to 16kB or 64kB.
kvm_invalidate_vncr_ipa() and invalidate_vncr_va() feed that 0 straight
into the range computation. When the size is 0 the alignment mask is 0 as
well, both ends of the range collapse to 0, and the first comparison, the
one that decides there is no overlap, is always true. As a result the
pseudo-TLB is skipped whatever range the caller asks for, including the
full IPA range passed by kvm_nested_s2_wp() and kvm_nested_s2_unmap().
kvm_nested_s2_unmap() is called from kvm_unmap_gfn_range(). A guest that
meets the above conditions therefore keeps its VNCR fixmap mapping across
an MMU notifier that reclaims the page, and still holds a writable EL2
alias of that page once it has been freed and reallocated for something
else.
compute_tlb_inval_range() and compute_s1_tlbi_range() already treat a size
of 0 as "no size information" and fall back to a conservative value. Apply
the same principle here, folding the range computation into a helper that
reports an overlap when the size is unknown. This also removes the
computation that was duplicated between the two functions. The result of
the test is unchanged for a non-zero size.
Fixes: ebb2d8fd81b8 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Fix incorrect VNCR invalidation range calculation")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
index dfb96edbdc43c6..3ac8789b458f39 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
@@ -985,6 +985,21 @@ static void invalidate_vncr(struct vncr_tlb *vt)
clear_fixmap(vncr_fixmap(vt->cpu));
}
+static bool vncr_tlb_intersects(struct vncr_tlb *vt, u64 addr,
+ u64 start, u64 end)
+{
+ u64 size, tlb_start, tlb_end;
+
+ size = ttl_to_size(pgshift_level_to_ttl(vt->wi.pgshift, vt->wr.level));
+ if (!size)
+ return true;
+
+ tlb_start = addr & ~(size - 1);
+ tlb_end = tlb_start + size;
+
+ return !(tlb_end <= start || tlb_start >= end);
+}
+
/*
* VNCR TLB invalidation occurs from MMU notifiers or TLBI instructions, and
* either can race against a vcpu not being onlined yet (no pseudo-TLB
@@ -1008,14 +1023,7 @@ static void kvm_invalidate_vncr_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, u64 start, u64 end)
return;
kvm_for_each_vncr_tlb(i, vcpu, vt, kvm) {
- u64 ipa_start, ipa_end, ipa_size;
-
- ipa_size = ttl_to_size(pgshift_level_to_ttl(vt->wi.pgshift,
- vt->wr.level));
- ipa_start = vt->wr.pa & ~(ipa_size - 1);
- ipa_end = ipa_start + ipa_size;
-
- if (ipa_end <= start || ipa_start >= end)
+ if (!vncr_tlb_intersects(vt, vt->wr.pa, start, end))
continue;
invalidate_vncr(vt);
@@ -1045,28 +1053,21 @@ static void invalidate_vncr_va(struct kvm *kvm,
lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
kvm_for_each_vncr_tlb(i, vcpu, vt, kvm) {
- u64 va_start, va_end, va_size;
-
- va_size = ttl_to_size(pgshift_level_to_ttl(vt->wi.pgshift,
- vt->wr.level));
- va_start = vt->gva & ~(va_size - 1);
- va_end = va_start + va_size;
-
switch (scope->type) {
case TLBI_ALL:
break;
case TLBI_VA:
- if (va_end <= scope->va ||
- va_start >= (scope->va + scope->size))
+ if (!vncr_tlb_intersects(vt, vt->gva, scope->va,
+ scope->va + scope->size))
continue;
if (vt->wr.nG && vt->wr.asid != scope->asid)
continue;
break;
case TLBI_VAA:
- if (va_end <= scope->va ||
- va_start >= (scope->va + scope->size))
+ if (!vncr_tlb_intersects(vt, vt->gva, scope->va,
+ scope->va + scope->size))
continue;
break;
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 16:26 Hyunwoo Kim [this message]
2026-07-28 9:46 ` [PATCH] KVM: arm64: nv: Don't skip VNCR invalidation when the TLB size is unknown Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ameGoxbn2wzBq2kL@v4bel \
--to=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox