From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D734BC433EF for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5813660527 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:12:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5813660527 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A144B0D0; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:12:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@redhat.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bVNo8tCuK3vJ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:12:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5AD4A534; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:12:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256DE4A49C for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:12:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35WlOvfB+fyL for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:12:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC67A4A3BF for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:12:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635264741; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y/8qPSuga2nSdD4ObnPRjMzoPwBrPBTCysCx0s1aic4=; b=HXeh27CV8hJRaETDK6hQOpnP45k3CVN3SmEZGClNq7UYeHDti1sMQE40Q9KP2PP6tyaQ2I orJVQXxUk8U1XN2n6u+a3epp9C/dCkhT5MuzOp8x/Js6W5Za41+LrdIs+yGwZJjYq0362v 79f1/BmEa6EFyJMmnSf2RTCKnOJQnls= Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-34-w5TawSx-MziT0siX2VBZhw-1; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:12:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: w5TawSx-MziT0siX2VBZhw-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id k28-20020a508adc000000b003dd5e21da4bso5905230edk.11 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:12:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y/8qPSuga2nSdD4ObnPRjMzoPwBrPBTCysCx0s1aic4=; b=AJgmPsb8TE/jM+1mZDJ1npUXKx98uek3dApKGd2/QwbLDNrRZLmfR/hvtimiQqYVt7 gWKDdIVTyJOhCom7bRTWpsMAPZ4QizouXQfDBjSRQFKHQ70DtVFUXTdoCMbFnZxSNz6k kXS5T5gbVaqzrkvbRZ/01FRCQHkjC5n/zpXvWFr976u5ZP7HbsAIiuPOg6LhYd9LiYG+ pRY++JqJW+/1ozt5NTPZESPHTn2y8NZTAsYpkcJ+pbV3EaZUPPZE2ntrpVO5a1SGGD6e EcTiPyrz1t+hxL7hLCIxnH17LGIDtJVHr2j1/30XswqxV5yxspN0Xc9v7GqTaAxbWRFX JsOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Mu8w8fRdhaq5Tm4jmicp8U1sWDIF0nsbV2RUJByjmA30uFSMD dxFUyh8bhiq5oSdNiNaXfpeHPbWDNUU8VyQS1aoIC0kenkuxFcrlHatc4em4YRUMLGj4y2VnajS MyCFJ0PJDoTY+jUvBcul1b5bG X-Received: by 2002:aa7:da84:: with SMTP id q4mr36991777eds.371.1635264738790; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:12:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwASeQAxYa4SVxx7fzZJcK2OTnFNOTNNHLf+PErJyPRemx/Rf7LwxYWqAfn33dB1Qf24eGGDw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:da84:: with SMTP id q4mr36991714eds.371.1635264738510; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm4753815edf.45.2021.10.26.09.12.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 18:12:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/43] KVM: arm64: Move vGIC v4 handling for WFI out arch callback hook To: Marc Zyngier References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211009021236.4122790-11-seanjc@google.com> <9236e715-c471-e1c8-6117-6f37b908a6bd@redhat.com> <875ytjbxpq.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: <875ytjbxpq.wl-maz@kernel.org> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Cc: Cornelia Huck , Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Atish Patra , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Claudio Imbrenda , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Janosch Frank , Joerg Roedel , Huacai Chen , Christian Borntraeger , Aleksandar Markovic , Albert Ou , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley , David Matlack , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jim Mattson , Anup Patel , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On 26/10/21 17:41, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> This needs a word on why kvm_psci_vcpu_suspend does not need the >> hooks. Or it needs to be changed to also use kvm_vcpu_wfi in the PSCI >> code, I don't know. >> >> Marc, can you review and/or advise? > I was looking at that over the weekend, and that's a pre-existing > bug. I would have addressed it independently, but it looks like you > already have queued the patch. I have "queued" it, but that's just my queue - it's not on kernel.org and it's not going to be in 5.16, at least not in the first batch. There's plenty of time for me to rebase on top of a fix, if you want to send the fix through your kvm-arm pull request. Just Cc me so that I understand what's going on. Thanks, Paolo _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm