From: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, andre.przywara@arm.com,
andrew.murray@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
eric.auger.pro@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 10/12] arm: pmu: test 32-bit <-> 64-bit transitions
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 22:31:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cead0930-958d-222d-d5c0-6dfe6f88f52f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200403071326.29932-11-eric.auger@redhat.com>
Hi Eric,
On 2020/4/3 15:13, Eric Auger wrote:
> +static void test_chain_promotion(void)
> +{
[...]
> + /* start as MEM_ACCESS/CPU_CYCLES and move to CHAIN/MEM_ACCESS */
> + pmu_reset();
> + write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 0, MEM_ACCESS | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CPU_CYCLES | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> + write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW2);
> + isb();
> +
> + mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> + report_info("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx",
> + read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0));
> +
> + /* 0 becomes CHAINED */
"1 becomes CHAINED"?
> + write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
Writing 0 into PMCNTENSET_EL0 actually has no effect on the counter
status. What purpose does this serve?
> + write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> + write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, 0x0);
> +
> + mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> + report_info("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx",
> + read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0));
> +
> + report((read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 1) && !read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0),
> + "32b->64b: CHAIN counter incremented and no overflow");
> +
> + report_info("CHAIN counter #1 = 0x%lx, overflow=0x%lx",
> + read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1), read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
> +
> + /* start as CHAIN/MEM_ACCESS and move to MEM_ACCESS/CPU_CYCLES */
> + pmu_reset();
> + write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 0, MEM_ACCESS | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> + write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW2);
> + write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +
> + mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> + report_info("counter #0=0x%lx, counter #1=0x%lx",
> + read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1));
> +
> + write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
Ditto
> + write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CPU_CYCLES | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> + write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +
> + mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> + report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 1,
> + "overflow is expected on counter 0");
> + report_info("counter #0=0x%lx, counter #1=0x%lx overflow=0x%lx",
> + read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1),
> + read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
> +}
> +
> #endif
>
> /*
Zenghui
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-19 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-03 7:13 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 00/12] KVM: arm64: PMUv3 Event Counter Tests Eric Auger
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 01/12] arm64: Provide read/write_sysreg_s Eric Auger
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 02/12] arm: pmu: Let pmu tests take a sub-test parameter Eric Auger
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 03/12] arm: pmu: Don't check PMCR.IMP anymore Eric Auger
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 04/12] arm: pmu: Add a pmu struct Eric Auger
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 05/12] arm: pmu: Introduce defines for PMU versions Eric Auger
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 06/12] arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support Eric Auger
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 07/12] arm: pmu: Basic event counter Tests Eric Auger
2022-09-19 14:30 ` Zenghui Yu
2022-09-19 15:10 ` Andrew Jones
2022-09-20 9:23 ` Eric Auger
2022-09-20 11:16 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 08/12] arm: pmu: Test SW_INCR event count Eric Auger
2022-09-19 14:31 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 09/12] arm: pmu: Test chained counters Eric Auger
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 10/12] arm: pmu: test 32-bit <-> 64-bit transitions Eric Auger
2022-09-19 14:31 ` Zenghui Yu [this message]
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 11/12] arm: gic: Introduce gic_irq_set_clr_enable() helper Eric Auger
2020-04-03 7:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 12/12] arm: pmu: Test overflow interrupts Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cead0930-958d-222d-d5c0-6dfe6f88f52f@huawei.com \
--to=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox