From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
eric.auger@redhat.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
wangzhou1@hisilicon.com, jiangkunkun@huawei.com,
jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, anthony.jebson@huawei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] KVM: arm64: Errata management for VM Live migration
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 18:42:04 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f42ee0db-645a-8710-d611-8e45c4e1a4e4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8634gtvdmi.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 16:45:38 +0000,
> Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
>>> On ARM64 platforms most of the errata workarounds are based on CPU
>>> MIDR/REVIDR values and a number of these workarounds need to be
>>> implemented by the Guest kernel as well. This creates a problem when
>>> Guest needs to be migrated to a platform that differs in these
>>> MIDR/REVIDR values even if the VMM can come up with a common minimum
>>> feature list for the Guest using the recently introduced "Writable
>>> ID registers" support.
>>
>> Currently MIDR/REVIDR are still RO and guest access is not trapped - so
>> even with the errata management patches in place the guest state would
>> change and a migration (between hosts that differ in these regs) would
>> not be possible. Are there any plans to allow to actually change these?
>
> Sure thing. We only need a victim! :)
;-) Nice. I'll hack smth up then.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-24 15:17 [PATCH v5 0/4] KVM: arm64: Errata management for VM Live migration Shameer Kolothum
2025-01-24 15:17 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] arm64: Modify _midr_range() functions to read MIDR/REVIDR internally Shameer Kolothum
2025-01-24 15:17 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] KVM: arm64: Introduce hypercall support for retrieving target implementations Shameer Kolothum
2025-01-27 12:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-27 17:26 ` Oliver Upton
2025-01-28 14:16 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2025-01-24 15:17 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] KVM: arm64: Report all the KVM/arm64-specific hypercalls Shameer Kolothum
2025-01-27 12:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-27 13:35 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2025-01-27 17:05 ` Oliver Upton
2025-01-27 17:24 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2025-01-24 15:17 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] arm64: paravirt: Enable errata based on implementation CPUs Shameer Kolothum
2025-01-27 12:53 ` Cornelia Huck
2025-01-27 17:37 ` Oliver Upton
2025-02-04 16:45 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] KVM: arm64: Errata management for VM Live migration Sebastian Ott
2025-02-04 17:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-04 17:42 ` Sebastian Ott [this message]
2025-02-04 18:15 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f42ee0db-645a-8710-d611-8e45c4e1a4e4@redhat.com \
--to=sebott@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony.jebson@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox