From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: "kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
yuzenghui <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 08/13] KVM: arm64: Add support for KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 18:00:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd9aee7022ea47e29cbff3120764c2c6@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86pm8iv8tj.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Hi Marc,
Sorry for jumping late. I am updating the Qemu code for the VCPU hotplug
to reflect Oliver's SMCCC filtering changes and I have few doubts.
Please scroll below.
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 12:59 PM
> To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Paolo Bonzini
> <pbonzini@redhat.com>; James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>; Suzuki K Poulose
> <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>; yuzenghui <yuzenghui@huawei.com>; Sean
> Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>; Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] KVM: arm64: Add support for
> KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL
>
> On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 08:35:05 +0100,
> Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 16:40:45 +0100,
> > Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> > >
> > > In anticipation of user hypercall filters, add the necessary plumbing to
> > > get SMCCC calls out to userspace. Even though the exit structure has
> > > space for KVM to pass register arguments, let's just avoid it altogether
> > > and let userspace poke at the registers via KVM_GET_ONE_REG.
> > >
> > > This deliberately stretches the definition of a 'hypercall' to cover
> > > SMCs from EL1 in addition to the HVCs we know and love. KVM doesn't
> > > support EL1 calls into secure services, but now we can paint that as a
> > > userspace problem and be done with it.
> > >
> > > Finally, we need a flag to let userspace know what conduit instruction
> > > was used (i.e. SMC vs. HVC).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > > arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 4 ++++
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 4 +++-
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > > index 9b01e3d0e757..9497792c4ee5 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > > @@ -6221,11 +6221,25 @@ to the byte array.
> > > __u64 flags;
> > > } hypercall;
> > >
> > > -Unused. This was once used for 'hypercall to userspace'. To implement
> > > -such functionality, use KVM_EXIT_IO (x86) or KVM_EXIT_MMIO (all except s390).
> > > +
> > > +It is strongly recommended that userspace use ``KVM_EXIT_IO`` (x86) or
> > > +``KVM_EXIT_MMIO`` (all except s390) to implement functionality that
> > > +requires a guest to interact with host userpace.
> > >
> > > .. note:: KVM_EXIT_IO is significantly faster than KVM_EXIT_MMIO.
> > >
> > > +For arm64:
> > > +----------
> > > +
> > > +``nr`` contains the function ID of the guest's SMCCC call. Userspace is
> > > +expected to use the ``KVM_GET_ONE_REG`` ioctl to retrieve the call
> > > +parameters from the vCPU's GPRs.
> > > +
> > > +Definition of ``flags``:
> > > + - ``KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC``: Indicates that the guest used the SMC
> > > + conduit to initiate the SMCCC call. If this bit is 0 then the guest
> > > + used the HVC conduit for the SMCCC call.
> > > +
> > > ::
> > >
> > > /* KVM_EXIT_TPR_ACCESS */
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > > index f9672ef1159a..f86446c5a7e3 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > > @@ -472,12 +472,16 @@ enum {
> > > enum kvm_smccc_filter_action {
> > > KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_HANDLE = 0,
> > > KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_DENY,
> > > + KVM_SMCCC_FILTER_FWD_TO_USER,
> > >
> > > #ifdef __KERNEL__
> > > NR_SMCCC_FILTER_ACTIONS
> > > #endif
> > > };
> > >
> > > +/* arm64-specific KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL flags */
> > > +#define KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC (1U << 0)
> > > +
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > #endif /* __ARM_KVM_H__ */
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > > index 68f95dcd41a1..3f43e20c48b6 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> > > @@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > * Trap exception, not a Secure Monitor Call exception [...]"
> > > *
> > > * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would
> > > - * otherwise return to the same address...
> > > + * otherwise return to the same address. Furthermore, pre-incrementing
> > > + * the PC before potentially exiting to userspace maintains the same
> > > + * abstraction for both SMCs and HVCs.
> >
> > nit: this comment really needs to find its way in the documentation so
> > that a VMM author can determine the PC of the SMC/HVC. This is
> > specially important for 32bit, which has a 16bit encodings for
> > SMC/HVC.
> >
> > And thinking of it, this outlines a small flaw in this API. If
> > luserspace needs to find out about the address of the HVC/SMC, it
> > needs to know the *size* of the instruction. But we don't propagate
> > the ESR value. I think this still works by construction (userspace can
> > check PSTATE and work out whether we're in ARM or Thumb mode), but
> > this feels fragile.
> >
> > Should we expose the ESR, or at least ESR_EL2.IL as an additional
> > flag?
I think we would need "Immediate value" of the ESR_EL2 register in the
user-space/VMM to be able to construct the syndrome value. I cannot see
where it is being sent?
Please correct me if I am missing anything here.
> Just to make this a quicker round trip, I hacked the following
> together. If you agree with it, I'll stick it on top and get the ball
> rolling.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
> From 9b830e7a3819c2771074bebe66c1d5f20394e3cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 12:48:58 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Expose SMC/HVC width to userspace
>
> When returning to userspace to handle a SMCCC call, we consistently
> set PC to point to the instruction immediately after the HVC/SMC.
>
> However, should userspace need to know the exact address of the
> trapping instruction, it needs to know about the *size* of that
> instruction. For AArch64, this is pretty easy. For AArch32, this
> is a bit more funky, as Thumb has 16bit encodings for both HVC
> and SMC.
>
> Expose this to userspace with a new flag that directly derives
> from ESR_EL2.IL. Also update the documentation to reflect the PC
> state at the point of exit.
>
> Finally, this fixes a small buglet where the hypercall.{args,ret}
> fields would not be cleared on exit, and could contain some
> random junk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 8 ++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index c8ab2f730945..103f945959ed 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -6244,6 +6244,14 @@ Definition of ``flags``:
> conduit to initiate the SMCCC call. If this bit is 0 then the guest
> used the HVC conduit for the SMCCC call.
>
> + - ``KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_16BIT``: Indicates that the guest used a 16bit
> + instruction to initiate the SMCCC call. If this bit is 0 then the
> + guest used a 32bit instruction. An AArch64 guest always has this
> + bit set to 0.
> +
> +At the point of exit, PC points to the instruction immediately following
> +the trapping instruction.
> +
> ::
>
> /* KVM_EXIT_TPR_ACCESS */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 3dcfa4bfdf83..b1c1edf85480 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -491,7 +491,8 @@ struct kvm_smccc_filter {
> };
>
> /* arm64-specific KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL flags */
> -#define KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC (1U << 0)
> +#define KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC (1U << 0)
> +#define KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_16BIT (1U << 1)
>
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> index 9a35d6d18193..3b6523f25afc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> @@ -222,13 +222,19 @@ static void kvm_prepare_hypercall_exit(struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 func_id)
> {
> u8 ec = ESR_ELx_EC(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu));
> struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
> -
> - run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
> - run->hypercall.nr = func_id;
> - run->hypercall.flags = 0;
> + u64 flags = 0;
>
> if (ec == ESR_ELx_EC_SMC32 || ec == ESR_ELx_EC_SMC64)
> - run->hypercall.flags |= KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC;
> + flags |= KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_SMC;
> +
> + if (!kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu))
> + flags |= KVM_HYPERCALL_EXIT_16BIT;
> +
> + run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL;
> + run->hypercall = (typeof(run->hypercall)) {
> + .nr = func_id,
Earlier this was the place holder for the "immediate value"
Best regards
Salil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-17 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-04 15:40 [PATCH v3 00/13] KVM: arm64: Userspace SMCCC call filtering Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] KVM: x86: Redefine 'longmode' as a flag for KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] KVM: arm64: Add a helper to check if a VM has ran once Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] KVM: arm64: Add vm fd device attribute accessors Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] KVM: arm64: Rename SMC/HVC call handler to reflect reality Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] KVM: arm64: Start handling SMCs from EL1 Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] KVM: arm64: Refactor hvc filtering to support different actions Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] KVM: arm64: Use a maple tree to represent the SMCCC filter Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] KVM: arm64: Add support for KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL Oliver Upton
2023-04-05 7:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-04-05 11:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-04-05 15:30 ` Oliver Upton
2023-05-17 18:00 ` Salil Mehta [this message]
2023-05-17 18:38 ` Oliver Upton
2023-05-18 8:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-05-18 9:08 ` Salil Mehta
2023-05-18 9:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-05-18 12:16 ` Salil Mehta
2023-05-18 8:54 ` Salil Mehta
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] KVM: arm64: Introduce support for userspace SMCCC filtering Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] KVM: arm64: Return NOT_SUPPORTED to guest for unknown PSCI version Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] KVM: arm64: Let errors from SMCCC emulation to reach userspace Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] KVM: selftests: Add a helper for SMCCC calls with SMC instruction Oliver Upton
2023-04-04 15:40 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] KVM: selftests: Add test for SMCCC filter Oliver Upton
2023-04-05 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] KVM: arm64: Userspace SMCCC call filtering Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd9aee7022ea47e29cbff3120764c2c6@huawei.com \
--to=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox