From: "Marek Küthe" <m.k@mk16.de>
To: landlock@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Question about using Landlock
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 21:19:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251119211937.52cd76a3@ciel> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3232 bytes --]
Hello,
I would like to use Landlock in my program to improve security under
Linux. I have a few questions about this:
1. The documentation uses the Landlock functions without syscall. [1]
For example, `landlock_create_ruleset` instead of `int
syscall(SYS_landlock_create_ruleset, ...)`. In which header file are
these landlock_* functions declared? My compiler says it cannot find
them. As a workaround, I currently check whether these functions exist
when configuring the project [2], and if not, I create them [3].
However, this workaround also has problems: syscall returns a long and
the Landlock functions return int, which means I have to perform a
conversion, but there is a possible loss of information from long to
int.
2. I don't quite understand how to add rules to Lockland's rule set.
When accessing the file system, I'm supposed to specify the fd of the
file, but then I already have that file open. And that's exactly what
Lockland is supposed to control. Another problem is that I work with
several libraries: for example, `yaml-cpp` to read my configuration
file, `libtuntap` to create a TAP device, and boost.asio to read and
write from this TAP device. These libraries create files without me
controlling this with my own syscall. How could I integrate Lockland
there?
For example, I create the TAP device (before Lockland controls it) and
then try to restrict access with Lockland. [4] However, I am unsure
whether I am using Lockland correctly.
```
tun_tap dev(config.get_device_name(), tun_tap_mode::tap);
[...]
landlock_ruleset_loop.add_path_beneath_rule(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE
| LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE | LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV,
dev.native_handler());
landlock_ruleset_loop.restrict_self();
[...]
const Crazytrace ct(io.get_executor(), ::dup(dev.native_handler()),
nodecontainer);
io.run();
```
3. Lockland introduces scoped access control starting with ABI 6. To
avoid getting warnings from the compiler (and linter), I need to know
whether the struct landlock_ruleset_attr has scoped access control or
not when programming. Since I only want to support the case where this
is true, I would like to check the ABI version at compile time and
generate a more meaningful error. How can I check the ABI version at
compile time? Is there a macro for this?
Currently, I am using a check to see if the compiler can compile the
struct with `scoped`. [5] However, I don't think this is very elegant.
I hope it's okay for me, as a landlocked newbie, to ask questions like
this here. In any case, I would really appreciate any answers!
Best regards,
Marek Küthe
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/userspace-api/landlock.html
[2]
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/crazytrace/src/commit/c9b3a0e51fadece1228f1f92522dccf0115df84d/meson.build#L101
[3]
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/crazytrace/src/commit/c9b3a0e51fadece1228f1f92522dccf0115df84d/src/landlock.hpp#L14
[4]
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/crazytrace/src/commit/c9b3a0e51fadece1228f1f92522dccf0115df84d/src/main.cpp#L163
[5]
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/crazytrace/src/commit/2580137d0d57b7261bd0e22e11853e9e75c2c2a7/meson.build#L122
--
Marek Küthe
m.k@mk16.de
er/ihm he/him
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-19 21:19 Marek Küthe [this message]
2025-11-20 17:36 ` Question about using Landlock Mickaël Salaün
2025-11-20 20:37 ` Marek Küthe
2025-11-21 13:21 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-11-21 15:14 ` Jeffrey Walton
2025-11-21 15:06 ` Max
2025-12-02 19:02 ` Mickaël Salaün
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-19 21:27 Marek Küthe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251119211937.52cd76a3@ciel \
--to=m.k@mk16.de \
--cc=landlock@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox