From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:53:40 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] imq or ingress+htb?
Message-Id: <200403022053.40759.stef.coene@docum.org>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20040302183118.6B8B.LARTC@schmakk.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20040302183118.6B8B.LARTC@schmakk.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

On Tuesday 02 March 2004 18:33, Patrick Petersen wrote:
> Todays quick question:
>
> Ive had problems with imq and getting my setup to work as planned. Im
> thinking that a better solution for shaping incoming traffic would be to
> put a little limit in the outer interface of the router box with ingress,
> and the shape traffic on the inner interface with htb. Would that be
> better than using imq?
Yes.

Stef

--=20
stef.coene@docum.org
=A0"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
=A0 =A0 =A0http://www.docum.org/
=A0 =A0 =A0#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/