From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 19:21:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: [ANNOUCE] iproute2 update Message-Id: <200406092121.52155.stef.coene@docum.org> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 09 June 2004 01:31, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > But should we break existing scripts?? One possibility would be to make > things case dependant (K =3D 1024 and k =3D 1000) or something like that. I vote for yes. What we can do, is use an other name so the difference is clear that it's n= ot=20 tc, but the new tc. Mhh, why don't call this newtc? Or tcnew? Or tc2? So people can use tc and not change the scripts, or use tcnew and change al= l=20 scripts accordingly. Stef --=20 stef.coene@docum.org =A0"Using Linux as bandwidth manager" =A0 =A0 =A0http://www.docum.org/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/