From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Boxman Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:21:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] which is more appropiate for a ciber-cafe LAN ? Message-Id: <200406221321.35701.jasonb@edseek.com> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 22 June 2004 10:50, Andreas Klauer wrote: > Am Tuesday 22 June 2004 16:18 schrieb ThE LinuX_KiD: > > FairNat ? > > http://www.metamorpher.de/fairnat/ > > You tell us what works best for you - > > I honestly don't know how good or bad my script will perform > for you; I only tested it in small networks (5 clients at home). > I got some positive feedback from people using slightly larger > networks like yours, which suggests that it might do something > useful, but you really have to try it out for yourself. I had considerable success using Andreas' HTB + PRIO per-user configuration which I adapted to my own purposes. I found it to be slightly snappier than assigning a bunch of HTB children per parent. I also stuck p2p traffic in a fourth bucket, as he did. Works nice. :) > Andreas -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/