Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mark Williams (MWP)" <mwp@internode.on.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] What is wrong here (continued...)?
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:54:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041224074200.GA4100@linux.comp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041223141235.GA6831@linux.comp>

> On Thursday 23 December 2004 17:52, Mark Williams (MWP) wrote:
> > > >As you can see class 25 has priority 8, so all other traffic should get
> > > >preference, which is not happening.
> > > >It almost seems like all the priorities are reversed...
> > >
> > > Err... I haven't checked the docs, but I think that's because the
> > > priorities are the other way around...
> >
> > Nope, the HTB man page says:
> >
> >       prio priority
> >               In the round-robin process, classes with the lowest
> >               priority  field are tried for packets first. Manda-
> >               tory.
> >
> > I did actually try reversed priorities after i made the graph, etc though.
> > It just made things worse... so they are in the correct order.
>
> If you have classes with different prio's, you have to know what's going on.  
> The class with the lowest prio has the highest priority.  This means that 
> that class will get the lowes delay ONLY if this class is not sending more 
> then the configured rate.  This also means that this class will get the 
> remaining bandwidth of the parent AFTER the other child classes are served.

Ok, so priorities are ignored as soon as used bandwidth of a class goes above
the "rate" setting?

Thanks.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-12-24  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-23 14:24 [LARTC] What is wrong here (continued...)? Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-23 16:54 ` Mark Williams (MWP)
2004-12-23 18:30 ` Stef Coene
2004-12-24  7:54 ` Mark Williams (MWP) [this message]
2004-12-24  9:10 ` Stef Coene
2004-12-24 13:20 ` Mark Williams (MWP)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041224074200.GA4100@linux.comp \
    --to=mwp@internode.on.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox