From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: /dev/rob0 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:15:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Connection tracking flush Message-Id: <200501260215.05729.rob0@gmx.co.uk> List-Id: References: <1105546032.5000.3.camel@WLESS> In-Reply-To: <1105546032.5000.3.camel@WLESS> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 12 January 2005 10:07, Mpourtounis Dimitris wrote: > Is there a way i can flush the connection tracking on my box (after a > restart in iptables)? > If the connection tracking module is unloaded and reloaded, my job > will be accomplished i think. Only way I know of, other than reboot. > The bad thing is i want this tracking > module to exist in kernel code and not loaded as a module. Why? What's the advantage in that? Maybe if it's a tiny embedded device, but in that case the reboot options sounds viable. -- mail to this address is discarded unless "/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/