Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Schulz <msc@antzsystem.de>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] has anyone tried adsl-optmizer kernel patches for dsl
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:04:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511221104.03299.msc@antzsystem.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436EA076.7040102@yahoo.fr>

On Wednesday 16 November 2005 16:03, Andy Furniss wrote:
> sophana wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm using wondershaper like script. But noticed imperfect
> > scheduling.
> >
> > By googling, I found some patches that takes the aal5 atm overhead
> > in the scheduling algorithms.
> > http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/ADSL-optimizer/
> >
> > Before trying it, has anyone tried these patches? they apply on
> > 2.4.29 kernel and 2.6.9 TC. I use centos4 with a 2.6 kernel, so I
> > can't try these easily.
>
> They should be OK as long as you are sure about your overheads.
>
> I use something similar and use ceil 286kbit while synced at 288kbit
> without problems.
>
> If your modem is connected by eth rather than ppp then htb/whatever
> will see the packet size as ip len + 14 - so you need to account for
> that.

can you explain this a bit more please?

> I think that produces a corner case (overhead < 14) where you would
> need to put in a negative number - I don't think that will work, but
> haven't tried.

should be easy to patch in. Overhead is only a simple variable which 
will be added in htb/* module for each paket. Only sign/unsign problem  
should be considered.

msc
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-22 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-07  0:31 [LARTC] has anyone tried adsl-optmizer kernel patches for dsl sophana
2005-11-16 15:03 ` Andy Furniss
2005-11-22 10:04 ` Markus Schulz [this message]
2005-11-24 14:59 ` Andy Furniss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200511221104.03299.msc@antzsystem.de \
    --to=msc@antzsystem.de \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox