Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DervishD <lartc@dervishd.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Which option is better
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:16:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051202201637.GA666@DervishD> (raw)

    Hi all :)

    Currently I'm shaping the traffic that goes to my ADSL router,
using HTB.

.    Root (HTB) 1:
.    |
.    |------------------------|
.    LAN (1:1)                ADSL router (1:2)
.    90Mbit/90MBit            200000bit/200000bit
.                             |
.                             (Here go some children classes)

    I find the above a bit overkill, since LAN and ADSL classes won't
NEVER borrow nor lend bandwidth to one another. Moreover, every time
I set up my traffic control I get the same warning:

    HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.

    Of course it is big!, it's my LAN class, limited to 90Mbit/s...

    Is there any better alternative to the above, given the great
difference in rates and the fact that I won't NEVER share bandwidth
between 1:1 and 1:2?

    Thanks a lot in advance :)

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to...
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

             reply	other threads:[~2005-12-02 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-02 20:16 DervishD [this message]
2005-12-02 20:58 ` [LARTC] Which option is better Andreas Klauer
2005-12-02 21:13 ` DervishD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051202201637.GA666@DervishD \
    --to=lartc@dervishd.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox