From: Peter Surda <surda@shurdix.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] wrr vs. htb
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:00:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2005626170412053@mail.routehat.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fad9d48405072603541bc984b7@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:54:17 +0200 Kenneth Kalmer <kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Guys
hi
>I don't know how healthy this is, and I don't have a clue on how to
>improve the performance or lessen the load on the box. I've also been
>contemplating moving the setup to a WRR-based solution, but I'm not
>too sure if WRR can equally share local and gateway traffic as
>different 'flows'.
I don't understand this "2 kinds of traffic" concept. Where is the server? In
the internet or local? If local, why the need to shape it at all? I can
acknowledge though that under certain circumstances when you have several
parallel WRR qdiscs, it leads to freezes. Perhaps if you explain in more detail
what the network looks like I can give your more precise answers.
>If possible, just share your thoughts on the best way to handle this
>scenario with the 'dual' shaping, different speeds for traffic
>originating from the network server and internet traffic flowing
>through the server. The main emphasis is on equality, everyone on the
>network needs to be happy.
WRR is perfect when you need equality. [advertisement]Check out shurdix cough
cough[/advertisement].
>Kind regards
>Kenneth Kalmer
Yours sincerely,
Peter
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-26 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-26 10:54 [LARTC] wrr vs. htb Kenneth Kalmer
2005-07-26 15:00 ` Peter Surda [this message]
2005-07-27 10:01 ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-07-27 13:47 ` Kenneth Kalmer
2005-07-27 22:23 ` Andy Furniss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2005626170412053@mail.routehat.org \
--to=surda@shurdix.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox