Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB: far unequal behaivor at a  slight conf rate change
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:38:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060223223835.GA23114@EIS> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200602231908.27900.luciano@lugmen.org.ar>

On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 07:08:27PM -0300, Luciano Ruete wrote:
> root->parent_all_host(256,256)->client_host_1(X,X)->host_1_prio(X*0.9,X)
>                                                   ->host_1_dfl(X*0.1,X)

What's the purpose of the 256kbit class? In the setup you posted, 
the 200/230kbit child class does not seem to have any siblings. 
Except for the root class, classes without siblings don't make sense. 
At least, I haven't seen any useful purpose for them so far.

> I've attached simplified ad-hoc scripts that reproduce the scenarios:
> tc_at_200 (full tc/iptables commands to recreate the X<200 scenario)
> tc_at_230 (full tc/iptables commands to recreate the X>200 scenario)

I haven't tested them, but they seem to be all right (except for the 
question above). I don't know if it will help at all, but could you 
post tc statistics for both 200 and 230 cases? You can get the statistics 
using 'tc -s -d qdisc/class show dev $iface' or similar command.
Also, did you check wether HTB is complaining about anything in dmesg 
when setting up the 230 class tree? 

Which kernel version and iproute/tc version are you running? Just in case 
you're still suffering from old HTB bugs...

Regards
Andreas Klauer
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-23 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-23 22:08 [LARTC] HTB: far unequal behaivor at a slight conf rate change Luciano Ruete
2006-02-23 22:38 ` Andreas Klauer [this message]
2006-02-24  2:42 ` Luciano Ruete
2006-02-24  9:36 ` Andreas Klauer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-25 11:06 Luciano Ruete

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060223223835.GA23114@EIS \
    --to=andreas.klauer@metamorpher.de \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox