From: ajpearce <ajpearceuk@gmail.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Hardware solution? (or v.easy software fix instead)
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27251cb805012015176990075b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27251cb80501201407a89427a@mail.gmail.com>
The linksys linux router sounds ideal. Has anyone setup bandwidth
management on it before though? Sounds like a tall order?
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:21:00 -0500, Jason Boxman <jasonb@edseek.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 20 January 2005 17:07, ajpearce wrote:
> <snip>
> > So I need an answer to avoid arguments.
> >
> > - Is there a plush hardware solution to the problem?
>
> You could always get one of those Linksys routers that runs Linux and
> configure Linux traffic control on it.
>
> <snip>
> > If I go for the computer option and I'm able to pull it off I might as
> > well make it a fileserver and use it as a single computer to download
> > stuff on (so bittorrent, eDonkey and so we have 1 computer left on and
> > not 3. If so what approach would you take for this? Use my own setup
> > but binary parts to be sure it will work including kernel, iptables
> > and iproute? - or should I take a distro setup for this and add stuff
> > to that instead? I need:
>
> L7-Filter hasn't been picking up Kademilia so filtering eDonkey tends to be
> difficult. ipp2p might be better about this, but I haven't tried it. I just
> filter based on IP for p2p since I only have a single box that does any p2p.
>
> <snip>
> > http://www.metamorpher.de/fairnat/
>
> fairnat ought to let you share bandwidth out between groups of machines, so
> you and your roommate ought to be able to split up the bandwidth.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-20 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-20 22:07 [LARTC] Hardware solution? (or v.easy software fix instead) ajpearce
2005-01-20 22:21 ` Jason Boxman
2005-01-20 23:17 ` ajpearce [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27251cb805012015176990075b@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ajpearceuk@gmail.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox