From: kasp <waters@inbox.lv>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] prio
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 17:08:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3927344519.20041225190843@inbox.lv> (raw)
Hi!
Could somebody tell me, what is difference between these two prio
parameters in http://lartc.org/lartc.html#AEN2241
1) tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate ${UPLINK}kbit burst 6k prio 1
^^^^^^
AND
2) tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip tos 0x10 0xff flowid 1:10
^^^^^^^
Why they aren't equal?
Is there some rules to set prio for each of them?
--
Best regards,
kasp mailto:waters@inbox.lv
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2004-12-25 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-25 17:08 kasp [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-02 0:07 [LARTC] prio Andy Furniss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3927344519.20041225190843@inbox.lv \
--to=waters@inbox.lv \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox